Featured Post

The white-Left Part 1: The two meanings of white

Wednesday, June 10, 2020

Will Trump send the elder the cops knocked down to Gitmo?

Gitmo
This is a serious question.

Ten days ago Trump tweeted:
Never mind that antifa is short for anti-fascists, like these guys:
And never mind that it's not an organization, just a label. The important point is that Trump considers anyone he labels as antifa to be a terrorist, and you know what they do to terrorists. They send them off to Gitmo or another black site for waterboarding and worst. From what I've seen, this important connection is being missed.

Martin Gugino photo by Justin Norman
Martin Gugino is the man Trump is threatening with terrorist status. He is a Buffalo native and long time peace activist. He has protested police brutality before, also military drones, climate change, and nuclear weapons. He is also a member of Witness Against Torture and has protested in the orange jumpsuit of a Guantanamo prisoner. Now it seems fair to conclude, Trump would like to see him wearing one for real.

On Thursday, 4 June 2020, he was knocked down by police in front of the Buffalo City Hall, and left bleeding on the ground. You've probably seen this video already. The really brutal part of how they all keep on marching off to war (against US citizens), and nobody even checks on Martin:



On Tuesday morning early, Trump sent out this tweet:
81 minutes later the Russian disinformation outlet Sputnik News is already out with a story on Trump's tweet:
Trump Says Elderly Buffalo Protester Shoved by Police 'Could Be Antifa Provocateur'

13:55 GMT 09.06.2020G
WASHINGTON (Sputnik) - US President Donald Trump on Tuesday suggested that an elderly man who was violently shoved by law enforcement during a protest in Buffalo, New York could be a "provocateur" member of the left-wing group Antifa. More...
Probably the reason they responded so quickly to Trump's tweet is that they gave him the idea in the first place. Trump references this report from the right-wing outlet OAN in his tweet:

Turns out the reporter on this story also works for Spunik.

So, it would appear that Trump has taken a conspiracy theory propagated by a Russian agent through a right-wing outlet, and given it the strength of a presidential finding. Does he know he's a Russian asset? Anyway, it's easy to see why Sputnik was so quick to report its success, but this still leaves the question of why Democracy Now left out the Russian connection.

But the big question raised by these tweets is: Can the President of the United States so cavalierly equate a label to terrorism, and then apply that label to anybody with no due process and not even a shred of evidence? Given the awesome powers given to the president, and what he is allowed to do to terrorists, this is a most serious question that needs to be addressed.

Clay Claiborne

Saturday, June 6, 2020

Costs of racism in Trump's coronavirus response

The daylight torture, strangulation, and murder of George Floyd under the color of authority has brought home to millions what some of the costs of white supremacy have been for African Americans. He was one of the many killed by the cops this year. Beyond the growing wave of violence by organs of state security is the “American carnage,” to use Trump's happy phrase, brought on by his incompetent handling of the coronavirus pandemic. Over a hundred thousand Americans have been killed in just a few months, and as usual, people of color have paid the highest price. But COVAD-19 has killed people of all colors at a higher rate because of white supremacy.

Unlike the cops, the novel coronavirus itself doesn't discriminate. It has infected all the nations of the planet. Yet one country, less than one-twentieth of the whole by population, has suffered more than one-quarter of the deaths. What's more, this is not the poorest country on Earth, but the richest; not a country with few doctors and hospitals, but one possessing the most advanced medical technology; not one relying on dirt roads, pack animals, and old trucks for transport, but one with the most developed infrastructure on Earth. What epidemic failure explains this?

I think the white supremacist outlook of our national leadership has been largely responsible for this massive, and unnecessary loss of life. By understanding this we can recognize the huge cost of white supremacy, not only within the current pandemic, but in our long history of tragic mistakes along these lines.

Here are some of its main contributing factors:

1) Trump doesn't believe in science.

This has had a profound and multifaceted effect on the failure of his coronavirus response. To understand why Donald Trump and his ilk so loath science we must take look at how white supremacy has always had a corrupting influence on science under capitalism.

Capitalism & Science

Even though they grew up in the same neighborhood, capitalism has always had something of a love-hate relationship with science. Most definitely, the capitalists loved the profits to be made from the inventions of science. So they invested heavily in it, propelled its development, and expanded its domain into every sphere. But they never liked all of its conclusions, and the more capitalism has decayed, the more apprehensive they have become about what science has to say about their system, and what “best practices” should be for the social organization of humanity. That is how the matter stands with regards to capitalism in general.

White supremacy & Science

However, even from the very beginning, those capitalists that made their profits most directly through the exploitation of people of color had a special bone to pick with science. From a philosophical point of view, they based their system on the decidedly unscientific view that the self-proclaimed “white” people were superior to all people with darker skin, and this gave them the right to “own” these people, as well as their land and resources. They were able to do this because of the uneven development of geographically separated groups of humanity at the dawn of the capitalist era. By 1619 enough uneven development had accumulated in the 3.3 million years since we started making tools in Kenya, that some groups of humanity were hundreds and even thousands of years behind others. Since those that got to capitalism first lived in parts of the globe that received less sunlight, their skin was lighter. In the eight decades following 1619, they fraudulently misappropriated the name given to the composite colors of sunlight as their own, and on that basis proclaimed that they were superior to all others. White supremacy was born, and from the beginning they had a problem with science because, beyond the fact that they really aren't the color white, is the fact that sunlight is made up of all the colors of the rainbow, none of which is white.

White supremacy needed science as sure as the slave plantation needed the cotton gin, but it also richly funded a corruption of science known as “scientific racism.” This is important because while the human mind is capable of concocting many fantastic notions, ones with money behind them have staying power. Thomas Jefferson was one of its practitioners and benefactors. He founded the University of Virginia, as “an institution with slavery at its core,” so that the southern plantation owners wouldn't have to send their sons to the anti-slavery north to get a quality education, saying “we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead.” But he spent many years searching for a biologic basis for white superiority, doing “scientific investigation” and promoting such drivel as Africans “secrete less by the kidnies, & more by glands of the skin...Perhaps too a difference of structure in the pulmonary apparatus.” Jefferson's version of “science” came with certain baked-in conclusions, he owned 607 slaves during his lifetime. Truth had a predetermined destination. And so it went at UVA after he died, and so it went for science as a whole. It corrupted science to its core. A little while ago “scientific racism” was accepted science, and the rot spread far beyond the narrow fields associated with biology.

Effect on Trump's coronavirus approach

Two of Trump's most infamous racist outrages also show us his great disdain for science. They are his enduring opinion that the “Central Park Five”  are guilty, and the birther conspiracy theory that Barack Obama wasn't born in the US. Deep prejudice supports both, and both have been conclusively proven false by solid evidence, and scientific investigation, including DNA in the case of the “Five.” Yet, Trump clings to his prejudice, and refuses to believe the science, putting who-knows-what pseudoscience in its place. Trump's refusal to believe what science has to say about his racist conspiracy theories is harmful, his refusal to believe what science has to say about COVID-19 is deadly.

The more strongly Trump leans on this bastardized “science,” the more likely he is to see all science as a con job in the service of some partisan interest, and to disregard it beyond its ability to deliver his desired results. That's Trump's problem with science, and it undergirds everything else that has been a catastrophe in his novel coronavirus response.

At every step of the way his lack of respect for the science has result policies that cost lives:
  • He was slow to respond to the threat.
  • He has refused to endorse or promote scientific solutions.
  • He failed to ramp up testing.
  • He refused to allow a “Manhattan” style project to create a vaccine.
  • He promoted dangerous “snake-oil” solutions from his bully pulpit.
  • He has disregarded any national health scientists he can't corrupt.
This bring us to Director Robert R. Redfield and the corruption of the CDC. According to CNN:
In the early 1990s, Redfield, then one of the Army's top AIDS researchers, was at the center of a scandal over a purported HIV vaccine. Allegations that Redfield oversold data and cherry-picked results sparked an internal Army investigation into his work.
...
Redfield was also found to be in violation of Army code over his relationship with a conservative AIDS nonprofit run by a prominent evangelical activist who has promoted abstinence-only solutions to the disease.
As you can see, Redfield was the model of scientific integrity. In 2018, Trump put him in charge of the CDC. Now the once renowned Center for Disease Control is a caricature of its former self. Before Trump all but sidelined it, its COVID-19 response was a tale of one failure followed by another, followed by mealy-mouthed advice to meat packers about voluntary steps they might take to keep their employees safe, if it isn't too much trouble, since Trump is forcing them back to work.

This is just one example of how the Trump administration's corrupt of the science has played a big role in its failure to prevent a catastrophic loss of life.

2) Trump didn't believe COVID-19 could hit here.

In his heart of hearts, he thought of it as a disease of “those people.” When he was first warned about it, he was sure it was just some Asian flu that would stay over there. When it became clear that would not be the case:

3) Trump thought banning foreigners coming from China was sufficient.

Don't you just get sick and tired of hearing him brag about that? Before the ban at least 430,000 people had already flown in from China since 31 December, and another 40,000, mostly Americans, came back in the two months after the ban started, with very shaky screening and self-quarantine. It was like he really thought “our” people can't carry it. Then, as the pandemic developed, it became clear that the virus was taking the most lives in the New York-New Jersey hub where it had been imported from Europe. Probably because it took Trump 40 days after the China travel ban to institute the European travel ban, like “those” people can't bring it here.

4) The Trump administration refused the W.H.O. COVID-19 test.

As early as 11 January 2020, Chinese scientists posted the genome of the new unknown virus, and with a week virologists in Berlin had produced the first diagnostic test for the new disease. By the end of February the World Health Organization had distributed the test to 60 countries. The US refused the "foreign" WHO test, and then screwed up attempts to produce an American made test. Trump was depending on his travel ban as the sole means of stopping the virus.

Even after the FDA came out with their own viable test, they were slow in rolling it out, and then with restrictive guidelines that barred people who weren't already sick from getting it.  More recently, Trump has stated publicly that he wants to slow testing down because he lives in a fantasy world in which a tree falling in the forest makes no noise if no one is there to hear it, and COVID-19 cases exist only if you test for them. The US was still trying to roll out a viable test as late as March, and even today most experts say COVID-19 testing in the US is far below what is needed to contain the virus.

5) Trump sees it as a disease of disposable people.

The very concept of “disposable people” developed even more harshly under conditions of slavery than wage labor. Racism made them less than human, and slavery made them property, and property is disposable. Everything we know about Trump from his practice as both an owner and employer tells us that he is of that mind. Since COVID-19 appeared to mainly kill people over 65, especially those in nursing homes, Trump saw those as disposable people not worth a serious effort. When it was revealed to be taking down a growing number of younger people, he downplayed the significance because a disproportionate number have been people of color.

5) Trump scapegoats people of color for COVID-19.

This begins with his blaming China for the pandemic and his annoying attempts to label it the “Chinese Virus”, then on to blaming immigrants, defunding the WHO, and now blaming the home life of meat packing workers for the COVID-19 hotshots in meat packing plants.

6) Trump uses the pandemic to promote his white supremacist agenda.

He has intentionally politicized certain coronavirus counter-measures such as staying home and wearing masks when out, to promote a macho white supremacist image. He has used opposition to state shutdown measures to support the re-emergence of some of his “very fine people” from Charlottesville as the white supremacist wing of the boogaloo movement complete with battle fatigues, Hawaiian shirts, and AR-15s on state house steps demanding “liberty.” He has been utterly consumed with the optics of the fight against the virus, and its effect on his flagging re-election possibilities, and shown a depraved indifference to his duty to limit the human carnage. All that was before his down-right fascist response to the people's just outrage about the murder of George Floyd.

Trump's approach to the pandemic has been greatly influenced by his white supremacist outlook, and the epidemic failure of that policy has cost tens of thousands of American lives of all colors. This shows how racism hurts everybody, and in this present case, Trump's racism has been deadly for all.

Protesters are essential workers in the fight against both racism and COVID-19

One of the objections raised to the massive shows of unity in the US and around the world is that they violate social distancing guidelines, and might lead to more COVID-19 cases. Ironically, some of those objecting were encouraging every state to “open up” two weeks ago. Fortunately, these protests have been outdoors where virus transmission is very rare, and smartly, the vast majority of the protesters have been wearing masks. They are aware of the risk, but know that it is worth it because white supremacy is also sabotaging the fight against COVID-19, and it could easily take another hundred thousand American lives unless this white supremacist regime is removed from the White House.

Clay Claiborne

Wednesday, May 13, 2020

THE COVID'S ADVOCATE

When I first heard that Trump was privately questioning the broadly agreed upon count of US coronavirus deaths, now quickly approaching a hundred thousand, saying that number was exaggerated, and they were really much lower. I wondered "How does that work in his mind?"

Surely, he wasn't doubting that thousands of Americans, roughly 85,000 (roughly indeed!) as I write this, that rang in the New Year with the rest of us, are now in body-bags, or coffins, after having tested positive for coronavirus, or having shown every sign of having succumb to COVID-19. Even I will agree that there is plenty of Fake News to be found, but surely, he doesn't think these people are faking their deaths? He must have another angle.

Then I remembered some commentary I heard on Fox News that argued that it was unfair to blame coronavirus for all these deaths because often there were contributing factors, or comorbidities involved, and knowing where Trump gets his Fake News, I thought: That must be where his mind is going!

When we hit that hundred thousand mark, is it really fair to say coronavirus has killed a hundred-thousand Americans? After all, most of those people were old and used up. You wouldn't get much for them in a wrongful death lawsuit. “Loss of Future Income? Give me a break! They're costing you money. You should pay me,” says the COVID's advocate.

It's like if you were apportioning blame or damages in a wrongful death lawsuit, in which Coronavirus, Diabetes, and Hypertension were all involved. You wouldn't say all damages should be paid only by Coronavirus, while letting the other parties get off Scot-free. That wouldn't be fair! That's how Trump, the businessman, would look at it. So, probably he is thinking that of that hundred thousand, coronavirus bears only a part of the blame, but is given all of it. Is that how he is arriving at a lower number?

Trump is threatening to sue China for coronavirus damages, whereas they are just another party damaged by the virus. That's stupid. That led me to thinking about how I would attempt to defend coronavirus is such a lawsuit, if I was the COVID's advocate.

It would be the height of folly to attempt to avoid paying any damages, given the mounting empirical evidence and death toll, but I think I could limit the damage to my client by arguing along these lines:

It's true that my client has amassed a small fortune through genome patents, name usage rights, and other deals with Big Pharma, and it would like to do the right thing. In settlement, COVID is willing to pay damages to every country equally, in so far as possible, for the deaths it is responsible for in each country. However, when the United States, despite certain obvious advantages with regards to economy, infrastructure, and health technology, summits a claim for 84,119 deaths, while South Korea summits one for 260 deaths, Norway for 229, South Africa for 219, Panama for 256, Israel for 264, and so on, I must protest, as the COVID's advocate, that this carnage in the US can not entirely, or even mainly, laid at my client's feet.

We recognize the requirement that a party seeking damages has to be able to show that they took such steps as considered reasonable and ordinary to limited the damages. For example, if someone scratched you, causing an open wound on a limb, and you sought no medical treatment, you didn't even apply first-aid, but instead let it fester unattended, until the limb had to be amputated, you can hardly lay that limb at the feet of the person who scratched you.

So, I would argue that if my client, coronavirus, a virus that is novel to all who have not battled it, and so really does treat all people as equals, has been found responsible for say 300,000 deaths worldwide, even with my client taking on board all the claims against other comorbidities that have contributed to COVID deaths worldwide, and the United States is but 5% of the world's population, then, even without taking into account the advanced state of economy, infrastructure, and medical technology in the United States, factors that should have limited the damages there, my client's responsiblity should be limited to that same death rate in the US. So 5% of 300,000, or roughly 15,000. The rest are due to the criminally negligent way “damage mitigation” was handled by the national leadership of the United States. Those deaths were cause because they didn't take my client seriously soon enough. They didn't take the steps to mitigate the damage that were taken in so many other countries. They looked on while the fire was kindling, and didn't call the fire department until half the house had burned down.

My client, COVID will accept responsibility for roughly 15,000 of those 100,000 American lives. For the remainder, perhaps you should sue the Trump Administration.

That's how I would argue the case if I was the COVID's advocate.

Clay Claiborne

Saturday, May 9, 2020

The murder of Ahmaud Arbery: UPDATE: Three racists indicted by grand jury

Was titled:
Arrest William 'Roddie' Bryan for the murder of Ahmaud Arbery now!


Then Titled:
William 'Roddie' Bryan arrested for the murder of Ahmaud Arbery


Racial slur used over Arbery's body. See UPDATES below.

On Thursday, two white men, Greg and Travis McMichael, father and son, were arrested and charged with the murder of the unarmed African American jogger Ahmaud Arbery in Brunswick, Georgia on 23 February 2020. This small modicum of justice was denied for 74 days. It came just two days after a video of the shooting, that Georgia authorities had in their hands since day one, was leaked and went viral on YouTube.



This video was shot by William 'Roddie' Bryan, a white neighbor of Travis McMichael, who also participated in the chase that ended Arbery's life. He should also be charged with murder, or conspiracy to commit murder.

Yesterday, William 'Roddie' Bryan had the audacity to hold a press conference, with his attorney. He is claiming that he was just a witness to the incident, and is calling upon the Georgia Bureau of Investigations to “Clear His Good Name.”

This is outrageous! William 'Roddie' Bryan is not an innocent man who came upon this scene and video recorded it as a good citizen. He was a willing participant, and active member of this conspiracy to commit murder, and should be arrested and prosecuted for this murder along with the two McMichaels. In the furtherance of this demand, I offer two proofs, both from the official Brunswick, GA files on the case.

The first comes from the Glynn County Police Department Incident Report.

At 0.19 in the video, Greg McMichael can be seen raising his .357 Magnum
to line up a shot just as the 'Roddie' moves to take him out of the frame.
I've never heard of a gangland killing where only the gangster that fired the fatal shot is charged with the crime, while his cohorts are listed as witnesses, but amazingly, that is exactly what the GCPD Incident Report on this crime does. It lists both the father, Gregory McMichael, who was armed with a .357 Magnum, and can be seen in the bed of the pickup truck, which bears the Gadsden flag and its “Don’t tread on me” motto, trying to line up a shot in the video, and William 'Roddie' Bryan, the armed neighbor who shot the video, and attempted to use his car to box Arbery in, as witnesses. This initial police report lists only the shooter, Travis McMichael, as a suspect. But even this very report shows that 'Roddie' wasn't just a citizen that happened on a scene and started shooting video. The police report states [bold added]:
McMichael stated he and Travis got in the truck and drove down Satilla Drive toward Burford Drive. McMichael stated when they arrived at the intersection of Satilla Drive and Holmes Drive, they saw the unidentified male running down Burford drive. McMichael then stated Travis drive [sic] down Burford and attempted to cut off the male. McMichael stated the unidentified male turned around and began running back the direction from which he came and 'Roddie' attempted to block him which was unsuccessful. Michael stated he then jumped into the bed of the truck and he and Travis continued to Holmes in an attempt to intercept him. McMichael stated they saw the unidentified male and shouted “stop stop, we want to talk to you”. Michael stated they pulled up beside the male and shouted stop again at which time Travis exited the truck with the shotgun. McMichael stated the unidentified male began to violently attack Travis and the two men then started fighting over the shot gun at which point Travis fired a shot and then a second later there was a second shot. Michael stated the male fell face down on the pavement with his hand under his body. McMichael stated he rolled the man over to see if the male had a weapon.
Actually, three shot gun blasts can be heard in the video.

Arbery was jogging while wearing a T-shirt and shorts, making it hard to carry a concealed weapon, and since he approached and struggled with a man with a shot gun without revealing a weapon of this own, it's hard to believe McMichael really rolled Arbery over to check for a weapon. Furthermore, the responding lead officer reported:
While in route I was advised there were shots fired and a male on the ground “bleeding out”. A short time later I was advised the male on the ground was deceased.
This implies that Arbery didn't die immediately, but “bleed out,” yet there is no indication that emergency medical services were called either by the “witnesses,” or the police. Greg McMichael was a retired cop, so he knew the drill. Probably, he turned over the body to confirm that Arbery was dead or dying. A living Arbery might tell a different story, and be a problem for them.
Screenshot from Incident Report for G20-11303

My second proof comes from the recusal letter of District Attorney George E. Barnhill. Greg McMichael has endorsed this account as an accurate description of the killing. After asserting “We do not see grounds for an arrest of any of the three parties,” the DA continued:
It appears Travis McMichael, Greg McMichael, and Bryan William were following, in pursuit [of] burglary suspect, with solid firsthand probable cause, in their neighborhood, and asking/ telling him to stop. It appears their intent was to stop and hold this criminal suspect until law enforcement arrived. Under Georgia Law this is perfectly legal,
So, it was three men in two vehicles involved in a common pursuit. Then he cites the Georgia law allowing citizen's arrest:
OCGA 17 -4 -60 “A private person may arrest an offender if the offense is committed in his presence or within his immediate knowledge. If the offense is a felony and the offender is escaping or attempting to escape, a private person may arrest him upon reasonable and probable grounds of suspicion.”
But these conditions weren't met.

In contradiction to Greg McMichael's claim that “there have been several Break-ins in the neighborhood and further the suspect was caught on surveillance video.” No break-ins or burglaries had been reported the preceding seven weeks.

Arbery was caught on video surveillance trespassing in an open construction site during his run. Just a foundation, really. This was reported to 911, but when the dispatcher asked “And you said someone’s breaking into it right now?” the man replied “No, it’s all open. It’s under construction … “ Then the caller said the man was leaving the site, “And there he goes right now.” To which the dispatcher replied, “Ok, what is he doing?” The caller said “He’s running down the street.” Then the dispatcher interrupted the caller's narrative, saying, “I just need to know what he was doing wrong, Was he just on the premises and not supposed to be?” That question was never clearly answered.

The Brunswick News has reported:
Arbery was an enthusiastic runner, according to friends and family. The former all-star linebacker at Brunswick High was often seen jogging in the community, according posts on the Facebook page, “I Run With Maud #JusticeForAhmaud).”
Is trespassing a felony in Georgia? Even if it is for a black man, I don't see the exigencies that called for these three armed men to attempt a citizen's arrest. This was not a lawful killing.
Screenshot excerpt from Barnhill's letter
There were three known members of this 2nd Amendment style lynch mob, and “2nd Amendment” is right! While these killers are trying to hide behind Georgia's “right to carry law,” students of history know that the original intend of the 2nd Amendment was not to assure all citizens, regardless of color, had a right to self-defense. It was demanded as an amendment to the US Constitution by Virginia to guarantee that the armed slave patrols that were so essential to the institution of racial slavery would continue under the new union. That is what the cryptic reference to “a well regulated Militia” was all about. I go into this history in some depth in Murders of Alton Sterling & Philando Castile: No 2nd Amendment rights for blacks.

According to a Change.org petition "Demand Murder Charges For Videotaper In Ahmaud Aubrey Death," William Bryan “also told police he helped chase Ahmaud and can be heard cocking his pistol on the video." This cocking sound can be heard ~ 0.13 into the video as the chase is coming to its fatal conclusion, indicating this innocent “witness” had also come armed to this shooting party. PLEASE SIGN THIS PETITION.

Clay Claiborne

UPDATED 22 May 2020:

William "Roddie" Bryan was arrested yesterday for his part in the shooting death of Ahmaud Arbery. He was charged with felony murder and criminal attempt to commit false imprisonment. That last charge is because "Roddie" attempted to box Arbrey in, as I reported abaove. The Brunswick News reported:
GBI investigators say Bryan, 50, took an active role in the pursuit of Arbery...Bryan followed Arbery in a vehicle during the final moments of the young man's life, videoing the scene as Arbery was fatally shot three times with buckshot at close range while struggling with Travis McMichael for possession of McMichael's shotgun.

However, GBI agents now say Bryan actively took part in the pursuit of Arbery. Between 1 p.m. and 1:20 p.m., Bryan allegedly made numerous attempts to cut off Arbery's escape, according to a GBI arrest affidavit.

“The accused did attempt to confine and detain Ahmaud Arbery without legal authority, by utilizing his vehicle on multiple occasions during the above time frame, with the intention of confining and detaining Arbery,” the affidavit reads.

UPDATED 5 June 2020:

After a seven hour hearing in Glynn County on Thursday, Magistrate Court Judge Wallace Harrell ruled that their was sufficient evidence to hold all three defendants over for trial. Among that evidence was testimony from GBI SAC Richard Dial that Bryan told police Travis McMichael said “fucking ni@@er” over Ahmaud Arbey's dead or dying body, representing an attitude completely unrelated, I'm sure, to the Confederate flag sticker on his tool box. He was also reported to have used this slur regularly on social media, as for example, when he said he loved his job because there “weren't any ni@@ers anywhere,” or said about another shooting it would be better if someone had “blown that ni@@er's head off.” Dial also said there was evidence of Bryan's racist attitudes in his communications. It was also reported that they hit him with the truck before they shot him.

Ahmaud and his Mom. He was born on Mother's Day, 1994

UPDATED 24 June 2020:
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution is reporting:
BREAKING: All 3 suspects indicted in Ahmaud Arbery shooting death

By Alexis Stevens
A grand jury has indicted the three suspects accused in the death of 25-year-old Ahmaud Arbery, the Cobb County District Attorney said Wednesday.


Travis and Greg McMichael and William “Roddie” Bryan were previously charged with felony murder in the death of Arbery, who was shot in February in a Brunswick neighborhood. All three are being held without bond in the Glynn County jail.

The indictment returned Wednesday formally charges each of the three defendants — Travis and Greg McMichael and William “Roddie” Bryan — with nine counts: malice murder; felony murder (four counts); aggravated assault (two counts); false imprisonment; and criminal attempt to commit false imprisonment, the DA said.
More...


Thursday, April 30, 2020

a correction, with apologies to Vietnam, 10 times COVID-19 deaths were lost in the Vietnam War

April 30, 1975, the Vietnamese people celebrated the liberation of Saigon
This day is celebrated every year in Vietnam because it was forty-five years ago, on 30 April 1975 that what Americans call the Vietnam War ended for the Vietnamese. It was on that day that Saigon fell to the People's Army of Vietnam and the National Liberation Front. It marked the successful conclusion of a thirty year struggle for Vietnamese national unity and independence that was formally initiated by Ho Chi Minh's Declaration of Independence on 2 September 1945.

That struggle began against Japaneses occupiers, continued against French colonists trying to make a comeback, and ended by defeating their American replacements. The price of freedom was more than three million Vietnamese lives, most of them lost in what they refer to as the American War. The United States also lost more than 58,000 of its own young citizens in its war in Vietnam.

That number was come up a lot this week, as the number of American lives lost to coronavirus has surpassed the number of American lives lost in the Vietnam war. US talking heads as diverse as Joe Scarborough and Tucker Carlson have noted it, but all too often, the way they have put it is like this:
"The number of U.S. coronavirus fatalities has now surpassed the death toll from the Vietnam War."
I beg your pardon, Vietnamese lives matter too! If you insist on putting it that way, please correct your language to make it clear you are acknowledging only American deaths. The current worldwide death toll from the coronavirus is less than a quarter-million, not one-tenth the death toll from the Vietnam War. Let's all work to keep it from getting anywhere close.
These statements are focused on the truly deadly reality of the pandemic in the US, but they overlook the tragic reality that more than American lives were lost in the Vietnam War, and for that I apologize for this self-centered perspective of my fellow Americans. More than ever, we Americans need to be taking a world view because all of humanity is on the same side in this war, but more than ever, we seem to be looking inward. More than three million human lives were lost in what we call The Vietnam War. Fortunately, for all, Vietnam won that war.

Now Vietnam is an independent socialist country of 96 million people that has gone from being one of the poorest countries is the world with per capita income below US$100 per year, to a middle income country with per capita income of US$1,910 by the end of 2013, according to the World Bank.

When I visited there ten years ago, the people seemed very  pleased with what they have accomplished, and in spite of the hardships they endured at our hands during the war, they have truly shown what it means not to hold a grudge, welcoming American tourists, veterans, and even US warships, which recently got them into the US coronavirus news.

When Capt. Brett Crozier of the USS Theodore Roosevelt, wrote about his concerns about the coronavirus outbreak on his ship, and then was fired for it, US President Donald Trump blamed him for stopping in Vietnam, and made the racist insinuation:
"Now I guess the captain stopped in Vietnam and people got off in Vietnam. Perhaps you don't do that in the middle of a pandemic..."
Trump would do well to learn from Vietnam's handling of this common crisis facing all of humanity, instead of trying to scapegoat them for it. Vietnam has been exemplary in its handling of the coronavirus. It may be the only country on Earth in which the coronavirus outbreak has resulted in a drop in demands on funeral homes!

The government of Vietnam acted quickly after the first 2 cases of COVID-19 were discovered in the country in late January. It restricted travel into Vietnam, and quarantined tens of thousands of people. Most importantly, they quickly rammed  up testing, and tested widely. Reuters reported yesterday:
Vietnam increased the number of laboratories that can test for COVID-19, the disease caused by the new coronavirus, from three at the beginning of the outbreak in January, to 112 by April.

As of Wednesday, 213,743 tests had been conducted in Vietnam, of which 270 were positive, according to health ministry data.

That ratio of 791 tests to every confirmed case is by far the highest in the world, according to data from health ministries compiled by Reuters. The next highest, Taiwan, has conducted 140 tests for every case. 
That ratio for Trump's America is a mere 5.8!
This week Vietnam officially announced that it had contained the virus, and was lifting the lock down. It reported a total of only 270 cases of COVID-19 and zero deaths! That claim of no deaths from coronavirus seemed to be born out by a survey of Hanoi funeral homes conducted by Reuters. Not only did none report an uptick in deaths during the shutdown, one claimed a drop in demand due to a shortage of traffic accidents, one of the main killers in Vietnam.

Vietnam had only 16 people who had tested positive for coronavirus when the USS Theodore Roosevelt came calling, and they were far to the north. Eventually, more than 950 crew members, including the captain, tested positive for COVID-19, so probably it was the Vietnamese that were running the greater risk by allowing the USS Roosevelt to call on their port. Imagine the graciousness and hospitality of Vietnam to welcome a warship, from the same country, and of the same type, that was used to indiscriminately slaughter hundreds of thousands of its citizens a half century ago. This is something else we can learn from Vietnam.

For more on the Vietnam War, see my documentary, narated by Martin Sheen, Vietnam: American Holocaust, now streaming on Amazon Prime.

Clay Claiborne

Trump's New Wall? If we put the names of all the Americans killed my coronavirus to this date on a wall, we already know how long it will be.