Featured Post

The white-Left Part 1: The two meanings of white

Showing posts with label Vietnam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vietnam. Show all posts

Thursday, February 1, 2018

Trump's gift to MS-13 the day after bashing them in #SOTU

The development of Artificial Intelligence Technology under capitalism means that competition among workers worldwide for a dwindling supply of jobs will be fierce. Self driving cars are expected to replace 7 million professional driving jobs in the next decade in the United States alone. Uber knows what's up. They are building an infrastructure and market position on the backs of its current drivers. Within the decade, they will be handing them pink slips and sending self-driving cars to take you to the airport. And this is but one example. We can already see the jobs lost to automation at the checkout lines of our local stores. What is harder to see is the automation taking place in the huge Amazonian warehouses that are replacing the local stores and their entire workforce, and while they now employ a host of delivery people, they, quite rightly, envision a future of delivery drones and bots.

All this would be fine and good under socialism, where the work reduction would be shared among all workers. Under socialism, it could mean the standard work week could be reduced from 40 to 20 and eventually even 10 hours a week, with wages raised such that those hours support a comfortable middle-class lifestyle. But we are still under capitalism where every technological advance is twisted to make the rich richer at the expense of the poor.

Trump's tax plan already lays much of the economic groundwork for this AI transition. In the past, the capitalist tended to put their plants where the cheap labor was, and they industrialized the world in the process. In the coming era, that is less of a consideration. Daimler, the maker of Mercedes Benz, is spending over a billion dollars to build a new car factory in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, and it will only create 600 new jobs.  Whenever did an auto plant employ less than a thousand workers? Ford's great River Rouge plant employed a hundred thousand workers at its peak. Today, its Kansas City plant employs 7,320, and its Louisville plant employs 4,610. Plants like this Daimler one are extremely capital intensive, the owners want to place these new ones where they will be safe. Trump's tax plan is designed to give them the capital to do that. His military expansion and increased police powers are designed to protect their investment.

The capitalists and their politician are no dummies. They know workers are not likely to take this lying down. They can expect much civil unrest, even revolution. The lessons of the Arab Spring and Occupy are not lost on them. What to do? One answer: Boil them like frogs. Bring on the changes slowly. Another: Bring back racism, big time.

White supremacy, even the very concept of a "white race" or "white people" was an invention of emerging American capitalism in the 17th century. Unwilling or unable to attract enough European workers to the new world, they took to kidnapping laborers from Africa. When the African and European bonded laborers made common cause and revolted together, as they did in Jamestown in 1676, the bourgeoise decided on a strategy of "white privilege," the "privilege" of not being reduced to lifetime bondage, as the Africans were. [They did try that first. Read the history.] Since then, it has always been one of the main tools they have used to divide and conquer the working class.

In the post-World War II civil rights era, the US bourgeoisie, or atleast the leading portion of it, saw that the domestic struggle against racism could jeopardize their power, so they allowed, even led, certain changes in the direction of social justice [while they externalized racial aggression to Korea, Vietnam and Central America.] They even forced these changes on the most backwards of white workers, and so they remained in the driver's seat of these changes. To a certain extent, they retained the ability to roll them back. If the term "neoliberalism" has any meaning, it is this. So in the face of this coming conflict with labor, it should surprise no one that they are bringing back white supremacy bigtime, and the Trump cabal is their instrument for doing this. This is what the white Left refused to see, and even aided, with its infamous "don't vote for the lesser of two evils" campaign.

While these neo-racists are initially focussing on illegal immigrants because they can call them criminals by definition, and then legal immigrants or would be immigrants, because they aren't Americans, it is easy to see that sooner or later they will be targeting all people of color, especially the 39 million African-Americans, for expulsion or extermination. To prepare the way, they are getting the public use to a government that routinely, and by its own laws, treats people of color with heartless cruelty.

On Tuesday President Donald Trump gave his first State of the Union address, and while it contained a number of racist slights against African Americans and other people of color, a real focus was to brand all illegal immigrants from Central and South America as criminals by retelling vivid tales of MS-13, the El Salvadorian criminal gang that first developed in Los  Angeles, and then was spread to El Salvador and from there to the rest of the world, because the US chose to deal with what was essentially a domestic problem, home grown criminals, by making use of a legal technicality to send those criminals to El Salvador. [Remember when they accused Fidel Castro of "dumping" Cuba's criminals on the US after they invited any Cuban that could catch a boat to come here legally? Immigration policy can change fast if it's thought a socialist economy can be hurt in the bargain. Remember the outrage that Castro would send his criminals here when they should have been locked up in Cuban jails! Remember the uncontrolled violence that brought even to an advanced country like the US? Remember Scarface?] Nevertheless, with no sense of history, and in a speech that was suppose to set the agenda for the whole country for the next year, Trump found a way to call out "the savage gang MS-13" by name no less than four times. He did this to stoke racism as a capitalist buffer in the coming crisis.

One of the things that makes racism work so well is that the racist power structure always works overtime to create in the oppressed population precisely those characteristics it claims most strongly to object to. Joel Kovel wrote about how this dynamic played out in the oppression of African Americans, which in turn became the prototype for all racial oppression, in White Racism: A Psychohistory:
Just as the dominative Southerner needed to keep "his" black body powerless, so does the aversive Northerner need a powerless object with which to play out the symbolic game. And not only must this object be powerless; it must be suitable to represent what has to be projected upon it. Thus for the black to fit into the aversive equations, he must be made into the affirmation of the excremental body. He must become the double negative of anality. the fantasy of a fantasy — not cold, pure, clean, efficient, industrious, frugal, rational (that is, not the pantheon of anal- negative ego traits which are the summum bonum of the bourgeois order) but rather warm, dirty, sloppy, feckless, lazy, improvident and irrational, all those traits that are associated with blackness, odor, and sensuality to make their bearer worthy of aversion. And so, throughout our history, whites have created the institutions by which black people are forced to live, and which force them to live in a certain way, almost invariably so as to foster just that constellation of unworthy traits. From slavery itself to modem welfare systems, this has been the enduring pattern, reinforced in popular culture and education by a panoply of stereotypes along the same lines. p. 195
Anal-negative is exactly right. Remember El Salvador is the one less than black country that Trump considers a "shithole," and here again he gives us an almost classic example of how the white supremist sets things up in the oppression community in such a way as to create the very problem he is complaining about. In this case, after tarring the whole immigrant community, as criminal, he has orders issued to strengthen the hand of criminals among the overwhelming law bidding illegal immigrant population. So it should surprise no one that the day after bashing MS-13 in his SOTU address, he had his immigration department give them this gift. From Newsweek:
ICE IMMIGRATION AGENTS DIRECTED TO GO AFTER UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS ATTENDING COURT

by Graham Lanktree
1 February 2018
Immigration agents are being told it is official U.S. government policy to capture and detain undocumented immigrants in federal, state, and local courthouses.

The new guidelines were reportedly formalized Wednesday. The policy, however, runs counter to concerns raised by civil rights groups, California’s Supreme Court Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye, and so-called sanctuary cities where local authorities do not, as a rule, turn over illegal immigrants to federal officials. More...
This is a real boon to gangs like MS-13 that operate largely among the undocumented in immigrant communities. In the past, if a witness needed intimidating, they had to do it themselves. With this change in policy, they are being helped bigtime by ICE. It assures there will be fewer witnesses willing to come forward from among that immigrate community to testify against the gang members, and fewer criminal complaints as well, knowing that a, now dangerous, visit to the courthouse will be necessary for their prosecution. So this measure can be expect to strengthen the influence of criminals in the immigrant communities, the very thing Trump was complaining about. And while it is possible that more MS-13 gang members will be deported as a result of this policy, through their networks, they are likely to find their way back much quicker than the illegal immigrants that were deported for coming to court to oppose them. [Imagine that: an American justice system in which the criminal and the witness/victim receive the same punishment - deportation!] Besides, history has already shown that deporting gang members, rather than imprisoning them, and rehabilitating them where they are, only leads to the further expansion of gang activity. For the racists, that is the desired effect. For Trump the enemy is not MS-13, the enemy is all people of color, and MS-13 is his ally.

Syria is the Paris Commune of the 21st Century!

Click here for our posts on the 2016 US Election
Click here for a list of our other blogs on Syria
Click here for a list of our other blogs on Libya3

Tuesday, May 16, 2017

Since Khan Sheikhoun: Murders holocaust enablers don't argue about

Thousands of Syrian civilians have been murdered by the Assad Regime since the sarin attack that killed 92 in Khan Sheikhoun on 4 April 2017. While a debate has raged in the West over the responsibility for those sarin murders on that particular day, the regime and its Russian masters have continued their grisly work of suppressing the freedom struggle of the Syrian people through the application of maximum violence.

Linux Beach has been very involved in this debate around the responsibility for those 92 deaths. Even today we are introducing a new page, Linux Beach Goes Postol, to bring together our most recent posts on that subject. But also today, we would like to take a step back from the technical discussions surrounding the facts of what happened on the morning of 4 April 2017 in Khan Sheikhoun, to take in the broader picture and better explain why we call those on the other side of this debate holocaust enablers.

Leading Veterans for Peace member Ray McGovern is one such holocaust enabler. My his own account he has "been working with Russia for the past 55 years." Through the good times and bad, you might say. He also heads a group called Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity [VIPS] which has generally been quiet on Syrian atrocities, but did come out strongly questioning Assad's responsibility for the sarin murders in Ghouta on 21 August 2013, and again for the sarin murders of 4 April 2017. Both now and then they have relied on Postol's proofs in their defense of Assad.

Before I started writing in support of the Syrian Revolution, I produced and directed a documentary film, Vietnam: American Holocaust. I even got Martin Sheen involved with the project. I got a lot of flack for calling it a holocaust. So did he. It came from those that would recognize only one holocaust, and they capitalize [on] it. I called it a holocaust because more than three million people were brutally slaughtered. With a half-million dead and counting, I call the Syrian conflict a holocaust in the making for the same reason.

I didn't call it "South Vietnamese holocaust" because I didn't buy the US government mythology that they were just helping the government of a small third world country besieged by powerful outside forces at that lawful government's invitation. I knew damn well it was America that was calling the shots, and responsible for the bulk of the killing. Moscow claimed to have all of Syria's chemical weapons under control in December 2012. For years now, they have been the most powerful military force operating in Syria, and have had command and control of all pro-Assad forces. This is Putin's holocaust. It is extremely unlikely that this most recent sarin attack, and even the ones that took place in 2013, took place without his authorization.

In the "It's a Small World Afterall" Department, below we have Ray McGovern questioning ex-General Mike Flynn in Moscow about the Ghouta attack of 21 August 2013:

VFP member Ray McGovern questions Mike Flynn in Moscow about Ghouta Attack

Published on Apr 16, 2017
Gen. Michael Flynn answering a question about Syria in December, 2015 prior to joining the Trump team.
Although this wasn't published until after the Khan Sheikhoun sarin attack, this discussion took place in December 2015. It must have been at the gala RT.com 10th Anniversary event to which saw so many connected to Putin and last years US election make an appearance. In addition to those at the table with him, apparently Ray McGovern was there. Julian Assange even made a video appearance. The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was getting Jill Stein to run for president.



One of the things I find most interesting about Ray McGovern's and Mike Flynn's discussion is how they just referred to it as "the Ghouta attack" when they are referring exclusively to the sarin attack of 21 August 2013, as if the Damascus opposition suburb wasn't bombed before that, or since. This is central to their role as holocaust enablers. By focusing on Assad's guilt or innocence in the case of a few chemical attacks, they obscure the day-to-day barrel bombing that is doing much more of the killing, and for which Putin is decidedly responsible, or the bodies being cremated in Assad's death camps. Because if they were to speak accurately about "the Ghouta attack" as a singularity, they could only be referring to the state of siege that community has been under since 2012, and continues to this day, as the videos below makes clear, even while we continue to argue about who was responsible for the 92 deaths on 4 April by sarin:

These air strikes on Ghouta two weeks after the latest sarin massacre have not been the subject of debate with regards to causality in the US. This is the way it goes for the day to day killing carried on by the regime and Russia. Since no one in the West cares about barrel bombs, the holocaust enablers don't need to try to peddle stories about rebels setting off barrel-bombs in the street just when helicopters fly by.

Airstrikes on Harasta in Eastern Ghouta, Damascus a month ago

Published on Apr 18, 2017
bombardamenti dell'esercito siriano ai danni dei ribelli a Damasco
As this video makes clear, this community has been under siege since 2012. Many thousands have died and still the people refuse to submit to the regime:

Eastern Ghouta Under Siege الغوطة حصار الموت

Published on Apr 29, 2017
Eastern Ghouta left to die
A month after the latest sarin attack, the people attacked with sarin in 2013, are still under siege and their situation is desperate. Did those who defended Assad in the case of that chemical weapons attack, and then went silent with regards to his hundreds of conventional attacks on the same community, contribute to this slaughter?

Residents of besieged Ghouta fear it is time to flee

Published on May 4, 2017
The humanitarian situation on the outskirts of the Syrian capital is worsening. The opposition stronghold of Ghouta has been repeatedly targeted by government forces, and residents now fear they may be forced to leave. Al Jazeera's Hashem Ahelbara reports from Gaziantep, on the Turkey-Syrian border.

The Syrian revolutionaries in Ghouta have had to fight a war on two fronts for years now. Here they are demonstrating against the jihadists, even while the Assad regime and its western contributors claim there are no revolutionaries, only jihadists:

Large scale protests against Hayyat Tahrir al Sham in Ghouta

Published on May 8, 2017
Al-Nusra and al-Qaeda in the Levant have come among us and are intruding into the Syrian Revolution.

And like the Regime, the jihadists attack the Syrian Revolution with armed violence:

Protesters shot at during demonstration in Ghouta, Syria

Published on Apr 30, 2017
Eastern Ghouta, Syria. Jaish al-Islam did the shooting according to sources. Demonstrators were protesting recent infighting between Tahrir al-Sham and Jaish al-Islam. Uploaded from Liveleak.

One problem with the Syrian Revolution has always been that although it has been a true people's revolution, there has been no central leadership. Both fighting and civil organizations have developed at the local level and the struggle for unity has been a constant one.

Homs: Syrian Opposition Calls To End The Conflict In Damascus's Ghouta

Published on May 5, 2017
Syrian opposition forces in Homs countryside read a statement and called the Syrian opposition forces in Eastern Ghouta area, Rif Dimashq province to halt the fight among its groups and unite against the Syrian regime forces
Here are a couple more blog posts we have published about the brave people of Ghouta:
01/27/2015 With Left support, Assad continues to kill in East Ghouta
10/07/2013 The Courage of Ghouta in a Craven World


Sadly, the situations under Assad's control is looking more like a holocaust everyday. The Washington Post reported yesterday:
U.S. says Syria built crematorium to handle mass prisoner killings

Karen DeYoung
15 May 2017
The Syrian government has constructed and is using a crematorium at its notorious Sednaya military prison near Damascus to clandestinely dispose of the bodies of prisoners it continues to execute inside the facility, the State Department said Monday.

Thousands of executed detainees have been dumped in mass graves in recent years, said acting assistant secretary of state Stuart Jones. “What we’re assessing is that if you have that level of production of mass murder, then ­using the crematorium would . . . allow the regime to manage that number of corpses . . . without evidence.”

“We believe that the building of a crematorium is an effort to cover up the extent of mass murders taking place in Sednaya prison,” he said in a briefing for reporters. More...




Syria is the Paris Commune of the 21st Century!

Click here for my posts on the 2016 US Election
Click here for a list of my other blogs on Syria
Click here for a list of my other blogs on Libya



Saturday, August 1, 2015

EXPOSED: US had plans to nuke Vietnam near end of war!

Da Lat today
Thanks to the investigative reporting of the NHK Newsroom Toyko, it has recently come to light that not only did the United States operate a secret experimental nuclear reactor in South Vietnam during the war, but that then Secretary of State Henry Kissinger ordered that the radioactive core be blown up as a last-ditch measure to stop it from falling to the communist advance. While this would not have caused a nuclear explosion like an atomic bomb, it would have been the equivalent of dropping a dirty bomb on South Vietnam. It would have likely killed thousands and made the resort and university town of Da Lat as well as the surrounding rich countryside unusable for generations.

Think Fukushima, done on purpose, to an Asian people by a fleeing imperialist power.

Map shows NVA advance toward Da Lat
In 1963, the United States started operating a small Triga-Mark II reactor built by General Atomics in South Vietnam as part of the US Atoms for Peace program. The Da Lat Nuclear Research Institute did its work in secret but by the end of the war, in March 1975, it was using fuel rods of the most advanced US design, much more advanced than anything the Soviet Union, its nuclear rival, had at the time, and the US was willing to go to very extreme measures to keep them from being captured by the rapidly advancing North Vietnamese Army.

It was so important that Secretary of State Henry Kissinger got involved. With the communist advance within days of liberating Da Lat, on 24 March 1975, Kissinger sent a secret telegram to the US Embassy in Saigon. In it he ordered that the fuel rods be removed and flown out, and that if there was no time for that, and if the core couldn't be buried under enough concrete, then the nuclear core, together with the fuel rods, was to be blown up. The concrete cover was not a realistic possibility at the time, according to Wally Hendrikson, who was then a nuclear fuel specialist at the Idaho National Laboratory and a member of the team sent in to carry our Kissinger's orders. In its report, he tells NHK World his understanding of his orders, if they couldn't get the fuel rods out in time:
“We were to dynamite the core.”
Retired Army Colonel Rich Miller told NHK,
"I actually did some calculations on how much TNT it would take, and so on.”
Team member removing fuel rod by hand
That it didn't come to that was due to the heroic efforts of a team of four men, including Wally Hendrikson, and John Horan, a fellow scientist. It is the log book maintained by Horan that detailed events from their landing at Cam Ly Airport on the morning of 30 March, when they were told by Ambassador Graham Martin:
“Blow up the reactor.”
Packing the fuel rods
Until their plane took off with the fuel rods safely aboard on the morning of 31 March, just two days before Da Lat was finally liberated from those ready to visit the region with long lasting death and destruction. The scientists accomplished this feat by disregarding all normal safety procedures and working through the night. They were up against a hard deadline because if they couldn't get the fuel rods out in time to make the scheduled transport flight the next day, the core was to be blown up. In the words of Wally Hendrikson,
“The town was a tourist town. A university was there. It was a great agricultural area. And you don’t do that sort of thing under normal conditions -- you don’t think of that. I can’t justify that. I think it would have been a war crime.”
Hendrickson describes removing the fuel rods
So to avoid any part in another Kissinger war crime, the team exposed themselves to the nuclear risk, worked in shifts, each of the four taking turns, removing the fuel rods by hand, while the other three sheltered behind a makeshift radiation wall, because the normal procedure that uses robots and cranes would have taken too long. They are the unsung heroes of this once secret tale of how the US planned to nuke Vietnam as it was fleeing the country.

Picture of empty core taken by NVA soldier
They could have dynamited the core, as they were told to do, and been safely away, but the explosion would have spread the nuclear material far and wide. This would have created a nuclear disaster of monumental proportions and been a war crime. This was in a South Vietnamese university and resort town that had largely been spared the war's ravages, which is probably why the US chose it as the site for the reactor, not a so-called enemy area, and yet the US considered it an option to murder its inhabitants to protect its secrets.

Da Lat Nuclear Reactor today
After the war, the reactor was reload with fuel rods from the Soviet Union and restarted. Today it is the only research nuclear reactor in Vietnam and has been operating safely for more than 30 years.

That was the 3rd time the US threatened to nuke Vietnam.

While Kissinger's orders to blow up the Da Lat reactor, if carried out, would have been like a dirty bomb, with the surrounding people and area "collateral damage" to a criminal hazardous waste disposal program, there are at least two documented occasions in which US government officials did advocate the use of real nuclear weapons to put down the liberation movement in Vietnam.

The first was in the 1950's when the French were fighting to get back its colony, and losing. On 22 April 1954, just two weeks before the French were to suffer their historic defeat at Dien Bien Phu, US Secretary of State John Foster Dulles asked the French Foreign Minister Georges Bidault, at a meeting in Paris:
"Would you like two atomic bombs?"
It was a serious offer of two tactical nuclear weapons to be used against the Vietnamese. The French showed great wisdom in declining. According to Professor Fred Logevall of Cornell University, Dulles
"at least talked in very general terms about the possibility, what did the French think about potentially using two or three tactical nuclear weapons against these enemy positions." [at Dien Bien Phu]
Bidault declined, he says,
"because he knew… that if this killed a lot of Viet Minh troops then it would also basically destroy the garrison itself"
At the time, the US was still hubristic from its nuclear devastation of Japan and whether it was "Atoms for Peace" or "Atoms for War," the nuclear genie was expected to deliver great blessings to the United States and the American Century to the world. Never mind the devastation left in its wake.

As Vice-President, Richard Nixon was one of the biggest hawks on Vietnam around that time. He was far more hawkish than President Eisenhower and almost certainty played a role in the Dulles offer. As President, he would threaten to 'go nuclear' over Vietnam a second time.

Archive tapes show Nixon wanted to use nuclear bomb in Vietnam


Newly declassified documents, published 29 May 2015, by the National Security Archive disclose top secret discussions by President Nixon and SecState Kissinger of nuclear options against North Vietnam. Roll the audio tape [excerpt]:
Nixon: "I'd rather use the nuclear bomb."
Kissinger: "That, I think, would just be too much."
Nixon: "The nuclear bomb. Does that bother you?"
Kissinger: (bad mumbling audio)
Nixon: "I just want you to think big, for Christ's sake."
This careless banter culminated in the execution of a secret "JCS Readiness Test"—the equivalent of a worldwide nuclear alert in October 1969. According to the National Security Archives:
[I]t involved military operations around the world, the continental United States, Western Europe, the Middle East, the Atlantic, Pacific, and the Sea of Japan. The operations included strategic bombers, tactical air, and a variety of naval operations, from movements of aircraft carriers and ballistic missile submarines to the shadowing of Soviet merchant ships heading toward Haiphong.
Nixon called it his "Madman" strategy, designed to make the North Vietnamese and their Soviet supporters think that Nixon just may be crazy enough to nuke Vietnam. Given that the US was to slaughter millions of Vietnamese with conventional weapons and Nixon had drastically increased the bombing, neither they nor anyone else could be sure that Nixon was just bluffing.

This information on Nixon's 1969 nuclear alert is new and it has yet to receive much exposure in the media. The Da Lat story that was broken by NHK Tokyo Newsroom a week ago is a very important story. It shows us, once again, the callus disregard for human life that characterised the US conduct of the war against Vietnam. It has received no publicity. None! Google "Wally Hendrikson, and John Horan" for the past month and you will get one relevant hit: Vietnam War Nuclear Mission - NEWSROOM TOKYO - TV. Once this blog post is published, you'll find two. That's how well you are served by the American Media!

Also published at Vietnam Full Disclosure

For more on the US War see my Vietnam:American Holocaust

Sunday, March 23, 2014

Remembering 50 years after US Holocaust in Vietnam

Although United States opposition to the Vietnamese struggle for independence goes back to its support of the French in the 1940's, as shown in the documentary film Vietnam: American Holocaust, it was only after the untimely death of President John F Kennedy that America's holocaust in Vietnam really began. The year was 1964. That year, with Lyndon Baines Johnson as the new Commander and Chief, General Westmoreland was made commander of the now rapidly growing US command in Vietnam, the Gulf of Tonkin attack was faked by Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara as a false pretext to pass a war resolution against Vietnam, the action figure G.I. Joe was born, and the US began its massive bombing campaign against Vietnam, a campaign that would eventually drop more bombs on that small country than were dropped by all parties to WWII. Before 1964, relatively few Vietnamese or Americans had been killed in the military conflict between the two countries. In 1964 it began a sharp escalation that would eventual deliver some 58,000 Americans and more than 3,000,000 Vietnamese to their graves.

It is now 50 years since those events and 2014 will see many 50th anniversaries of things related to the Vietnam War. Those of us who fought for peace during that war hoped that its conclusion would lead to an America that had "learned its lesson" about the morality and even usefulness of aggressive military power, but we have seen that those lessons were never learned. They waited for a generation to pass and American's aversion to wars against little countries that the warmongers derisively called "the Vietnam Syndrome" to ease, and then it was off to Afghanistan, Iraq and the Drone Wars.

In a further effort to expand popular acceptance of their addiction to war, they already have a 13 year long plan in place that will cost tens of millions of dollars, The United States of America Vietnam War Commemoration. The bill creating it was signed by President Barack Obama. They plan to use the 50th anniversary of Vietnam War events to remake its image in the public mind as another one of America's "good wars."

We need to do everything we can to oppose this makeover and assure that the true picture of the Vietnam War, an inherently anti-war picture, is preserved and passed down to future generations. With that view in mind, I produced and directed Vietnam: American Holocaust in 2008, and I think it is now more important than ever. I offer it as a powerful tool to subvert this planned makeover. Therefore I am asking you to buy this DVD and show it around in the coming year. You should also consider giving a copy to a local library or school. That will help to assure that a true picture of the Vietnam War will be preserved.

Comments on Vietnam: American Holocaust
It was a holocaust. Every American should see this film!
- Ron Kovic,Vietnam veteran & author Born on the 4th of July

I do a lot of public speaking on the subject of Vietnam. As I was watching the documentary, I kept thinking, ‘Wow, I can't wait to get this into the high schools.’ Clay has done an excellent job of piecing together the historical record. He uses footage, some of which I've never seen before, and it is so good. In my talks, I will say Eisenhower said this or McNamara said that. This documentary shows them actually saying it.
-Scott Camil, 1st Marines (1965-1967), Winter Soldier (1971)

Good job with the film. Very powerful. I think [Clay] did a good job of connecting Vietnam and Iraq without beating it into the ground. White phosphorous moment is particularly strong.
-David Zeiger, Director Sir! No Sir!

I love it .It's the best thing I've seen. I've seen Winter Solider, Hearts & Minds, you name it, I've seen it. This is the best thing I've seen.
-David Slaky, Veterans for Peace, St. Louis

This is the best political video on Vietnam and its historic relevance to our times I have ever seen. You really got to it, from the Garvey connection in Harlem of Ho Chi Min to our support of the French and the British release of the Japanese in Vietnam. It cuts deep enough to enrage me.
-Stuart M. Chandler, Rotten Tomatoes

The best documentary ever made on the Vietnam War.
- Blase Bonpane, Director of the Office of the Americas

Thank you so very much. Thank you.
- Vy Xuan Hong, Member, NA, Vietnam
Buy the DVD from the Vietnam: American Holocaust website or Amazon.com


Also visit the Veterans for Peace Full Disclosure: Towards an Honest Commeration of the American War in Vietnam website and sign the Open letter to the American people.

Thursday, January 30, 2014

The Tet Offensive: a turning point in the Vietnam War

Today is 46th Anniversary of the start of Tet Offensive, one of the largest military campaigns of the Vietnam War. Beginning on 30 January 1968, Viet Cong and North Vietnamese forces launched country wide attacks on United States and South Vietnamese forces that completely exposed the lie being told to the American people by President Lyndon Johnson and his military leadership that the Vietnam War was winding down and the US was winning. Instead we awoke to the news that the national liberation forces had people everywhere and were carrying out what they called the  "General Offensive and Uprising" (Cuộc Tổng tiến công và nổi dậy).

The offensive was the largest mobilization carried out by either side in the war to that point, it involved more than 80,000 Vietnamese troops fighting to reunited Vietnam and free it from foreign military domination for the first time since the French began their military conquest in 1859. The offensive took place in more than 100 towns and cities, including 36 of the 44 provincial capitals, five of the six autonomous cities, 72 of 245 district towns, and the southern capital Saigon where they lay siege to the headquarters of the ARVN General Staff at Tan Son Nhut Air Base; the Independence Palace, the Long Binh Naval Headquarters, the National Radio Station and, most dramatically, the huge US embassy in Saigon. The BBC would report, on the second day of the offensive, which would last to 28 March 1968:
The American command in Vietnam has reported over 5,000 people dead after two days intensive fighting.

South Vietnamese President Nguyen Van Thieu has been forced to declare martial law as communist forces, under General Vo Nguyen Giap, have kept up sustained assaults on several fronts - from Saigon in the south to Hue in the north.

Authorities in the North Vietnamese capital Hanoi, described it as, "a more powerful and more continuous offensive" than ever before.

White House intelligence in Washington anticipated attacks over the Tet holiday to celebrate the lunar new year, but they were surprised by their intensity.
...
Vietcong forces have also attacked the Vietnam general staff headquarters, Navy headquarters, two police stations and the Philippine Ambassador's residence as well as blowing up the radio station in Saigon.

Communications are in chaos and commercial flights from the airport have been cancelled.

North Vietnamese - Vietminh - troops have reinforced their siege of Khe Sanh, near the demilitarised zone.

Some commentators expect the so-called Tet Offensive will shatter the American resolve and have a similar effect on the US to that on the French after the North Vietnamese victory at Dien Bien Phu in 1954 - which contributed to the Geneva Agreements later that year.
Note that even as late as '68, the BBC hadn't got the memo from US military PsyOps that the Viet Minh were being rebranded as the "Viet Cong."

General Vo Nguyen Giap who led the Viet Minh forces against the French and then the United States, and was the architect of their victories both at Dien Bien Phu and the Tet Offensive, died in 2013 at the ripe old age of 102.

The reason the Tet Offensive caused such a dramatic shift in American public opinion is that it so completely exposed the lie we had been told about how the war was going. Kevin Murphy, UC Berkley, wrote about the Tet Offensive:
One reason Tet proved such a shock to Americans was that all reports before the offensive seemed to indicate that the US, unlike the French before them, was winning the war in Southeast Asia. “It is significant that the enemy has not won a major battle in more than a year,” General William Westmoreland had told the press in November of 1967. “His guerrilla force is declining at a steady rate...We have reached an important point when the end begins to come into view.” Vice- President Hubert Humphrey echoed the sentiments on Meet the Press that same month. “We are beginning to win this struggle,” Humphrey declared. “We are on the offensive. Territory is being gained. We are making steady progress.” And President Lyndon Johnson had said much the same about the war earlier that year: “We are very sure that we are on the right track.”
With the success of the Tet Offensive and the consequential exposure of the real weakness of the US position in Vietnam, the end did indeed come into view, serious Peace Talks began in Paris in May of that year. Although this first round of talks were sabotaged through the combined efforts of Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger, and it would take another four years of killing and dying before US ground troops finally left Vietnam, the Tet Offensive, which began 46 years ago today, told everybody just how things were going to turn out.

To learn more about the Tet Offensive and the Vietnam War. See my documentary film Vietnam: American Holocaust. It is available both from VietnamAmericanHolocaust.com and Amazon.

Friday, November 22, 2013

The shot that killed Kennedy escalated the Vietnam War

"Since November 22, 1963, a curse has fallen upon this country. . . . Since this tragic date, the mainland breaks have gradually worsened, and the ground swell has been relegated to the ranks of the unlikely. Cities burn, schools are sieged and overseas commitments increase. It's only a matter of time before this upheaval shall reach endeavors such as surfing."
                                                    -- Miki Dora, legendary Malibu surfer ~ 1965
President John F Kennedy was assassinated 50 years ago today. Since that date there has been a lot of speculation about who killed him and why, and there has been a lot of doubt with regards to the official version of events. I don't have any answers but I still have many questions and one of the first ones I ask in all such circumstances is "cui bono?" Who benefits?

Beyond all the conspiracy theories, this is what we do know: On 15 November 1963, one week before Kennedy was assassinated, following an October prediction by his Secretary of Defence Robert McNamara that all US troops would be gone from Vietnam by the end of 1965, General Harkins announced that the first one thousand of the then fifteen thousand five hundred US 'advisors' would come home by Christmas.

As we know, this is not how things worked out.

Lyndon B Johnson replaced John F Kennedy as president on 22 November 1963 and just four days later, on 26 November 1963, he issued National Security Action Memorandum No. 273 which outlined a policy of escalation in Vietnam that would see more than half a million US troops in Vietnam before the Johnson presidency was over.

Millions died in the Vietnam War, including more than 58 thousand Americans, but $$$ Billions were made by the Military-Industrial Complex.

These are the facts. Was there a connection? Who can say? But like I always say: Cui Bono!

Martin Sheen isn't just a great actor. He is also a true student of history and was a strong supporter of President Kennedy, a role he tried to emulated in his long running TV show Westwing. When I produced and directed Vietnam: American Holocaust in 2008, Martin Sheen did more than just narrate. He also wrote a piece about this connection between the Kennedy assassination and the Vietnam War, which I included as one of five special added features on the DVD.

In commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the assassination of President John F Kennedy, I have released this feature to the Linux Beach You Tube channel so that it will be more generally available for free:

Kennedy Wants Out - written & narrated by Martin Sheen, directed & edited by Clay Claiborne



On the day after President Obama has secured an agreement that will extend the war in Afghanistan past 2014 and US imperialism threatens other new wars all across the globe, the true history of the Vietnam War and its era become even more important. This is more so in light of Obama's plans to give the history of the Vietnam War a 13 year, multimillion dollar makeover in the hopes that future generations can be convinced that it was a good war.


There is much more in the DVD, including the hardest-hitting, most brutally honest documentary that anyone has ever made on the Vietnam War, which is precisely why Martin Sheen agreed to narrate it.

Now it is more vital than ever. Purchase your copy today from Linux Beach or Amazon. Show it to your friends. Put it in your libraries and schools. A battle is brewing over our collective memory of this great tragedy and it is a battle that we can't allow the war mongers to win!

Saturday, October 5, 2013

Võ Nguyên Giáp on learning war from the people


Võ Nguyên Giáp, who died yesterday at the age of 102, had no formal military training yet he led the armed struggle for Vietnamese independence for more than 30 years, and is widely considered one of the greatest generals of all time.

Much of that greatness can be traced to his ability to learn from the people. In the following passage from Fighting under Siege, Giới Publishers, Hanoi, 2004, pp 106-110, General Giap recounts some of the earliest days of this struggle, in the winter of 1946-47, and how he was able to learn lessons from a company he thought had been destroyed; lessons that would powerful shape the war going forward:
After the fourth military conference, I planned to visit Tuyên Quảng and Chiêm Hóa before the arrival of the dry season But during the conference, Nguyên Khang, secretary of Zone 12, made reference to our fighting in occupied zones in the southern part of Bắc Ninh. I was concerned about this, so I decided to visit Zone 12 first.

War zone 12 was then composed of Lang Son, Bắc Giang, Bắc Ninh, Hải Ninh, Hòn Gai, Quảng Yên (including Dong Trieu and Chí Linh) provinces.
General Giáp on the way to Military Zone 12
It was my first return to this midland region since my move to Việt Bắc. I noticed a strange phenomenon: an independent company of the main provincial force of Bắc Ninh had always remained in the enemy-occupied region.

This unit was originally a 100-strong company of the self-guards of Ngoc Thuy (Gia Lam) many of whom were workers at the Gia Lam Railway Factory who had sworn to fight to the death after the night of December 19 [1946, start of Battle of Hanoi - clay] . The province provided the unit with one additional platoon of self-guards from Bắc Ninh town and about 100 guerrillas chosen from various communes. The company was organized into five platoons, including one section of Christian self-guards from Al Mo village and one section of women called Section Trưng Trắc.

The company coordinated its operations with a main force battalion from the Bắc Bắc regiment. When the enemy launched large-scale offensives, the battalion commander ordered the unit to withdraw. The communications person who brought the order to the company was wounded which cut off the company's links with the battalion. The company was besieged on all sides and the regiment thought it had been annihilated. Some time later, the regiment learned that the company was still fighting, ordered it to withdraw. But the whole unit, from officers to ordinary soldiers, asked to continue fighting. They convinced their superior officers that it was impossible for the French to annihilate them. The militia and the people living in surrounding districts to the south of Bắc Ninh unanimously asked the provincial authorities to let the company remain in the enemy-controlled territory, promising to take care of the men.

The company was able to survive because it was firmly supported by the people. Our fighters relied on fighting villages. They concentrated then dispersed into platoons or sections in order to fight the enemy. The French knew that parts of our forces remained. They frantically searched for them, trying by all means to extricate them or to drive them out of the region. However, they could not. Through the determination of this company, the guerilla movement was not only maintained but expanded. French soldiers travelling in small numbers were annihilated. The French administration in many communes was afraid of the Việt Minh. Many wicked elements were killed. Quite a few people involved in the French administration became two-faced, working for the enemy but actually obeying the directions and control of the Việt Minh. Thanks to this single company, the province's main force could easily enter and leave the occupied zone to organize ambushes and surprise attacks far behind the enemy's rear.

Even before the August 1945 general insurrection, Bắc Ninh had organized fighting villages. The Japanese and the security guards had found it very difficult to intrude into these villages. After 19 December 1946, resistance villages developed widely. Faking the lead were Dinh Bang, Tu He, and Lang Giang villages. Each village had a battle area filled with tunnels, trenches, fortifications, mines, pikes, and booby traps. Militiamen and self-guards strictly controlled the coming and going of all strangers. Although these were isolated battlefields, our forces were often caught in the middle of big sweeps but by relying on the tunnels and trenches even with scarce arms and ammunitions, they could hinder the advance of the enemy. The resistant village in Ái Quốc commune and Cam village, located next to the dike of the Dương river caused great losses to the enemy, obliging them to give up lens sweep operation mid-way through. Dinh Bang village north of Bắc Ninh did not let the enemy go beyond its bamboo hedge a single time in six months.

I discussed the development of more independent volunteer companies, describing the experiences of the independent company of Bắc Ninh in the areas newly occupied by the enemy. I also described the multiplication of the resistance villages with the mat Committee and Command.

6

Fighting in south Bắc Ninh was like opening the page of a new book. During the anti-Japanese struggle in Cao-Bắc-Lang, I realized that the platoon was the right size for armed agitation work and that only a company could have sufficient strength to survive and to carry out efficient military activity in an enemy-controlled area. Our fourth military conference decided to allow forces of company size to remain to the enemy's rear. This decision proved correct. To widely develop guerilla warfare, the role played by an independent company was indispensable. On the way back, I wondered what size a main-force unit should be be most effective should the French attack Việt Bắc.

We intended to organize two main-force divisions The zones eagerly chose their best battalions and their best weapons and exposed them to the High Command. But the war broke out and expanded very quickly. Contingents had to be sent to the South and regiments were busy with their own war zones and battlefields. The conditions were not right to concentrate our strategic reserve forces order to repel the enemy's large-scale offensives.

In mid-August, the Government approved a decree organizing an independent division under the High Command. Hoang Van Thai, chief of the general staff, was expected to become division commander, with preparations made by the High Command.

While thinking about the animated atmosphere surrounding the setting up of the division, the image of the volunteer company living behind enemy lines in southern Bắc Ninh became clearer and clearer. I was on horseback, climbing a slope through a narrow pass that marked the boundary between the mid-lands and Việt Bắc. At the top of the pass, clumps of bamboo shone brilliant green in the yellow autumnal sun. Gusts of wind brought the cold from Thai Nguyên. I felt comfortable and completely at ease. Still on horseback an idea flashed across my mind like a bolt of lightning, clarifying my thoughts.

At that moment, I realized that to ensure the steady progress of the resistance war, we could not yet concentrate our troops into divisions and prepare for large-scale battles. On the contrary, we must undergo a long-term process of training our troops from bottom to top. Past events appeared in my mind one by one: the breaking up of the Hue' battlefield, the failed regiment-scale attack on Ha Dong town, the company of volunteers in Bắc Ninh's enemy's rear, and so on. All this proved that what we needed to do now was to disperse part of our forces into companies operating guerilla warfare deep in the enemy rear. Our main forces must be trained to fight at the battalion level before undergoing training for larger-scale battles.

From Thai Nguyên town, I decided to go on to Cho Chu where Uncle Ho was living, but his residence had been removed to Diem Mac.

After dinner, sitting by the fire in a house on stilts, I reported to him on the fourth military conference and my visit to Zone 12: '"The enemy is preparing for a large-scale offensive to wipe out our main force and achieve an early end to the war. Our troops with their present level of equipment and skills are not capable of fighting in big concentrations. I propose to Uncle Ho and the Standing Central Committee that we delay for some time the organization of division-sized units. We stand for resistance by all the people in all respects, but guerilla warfare to the enemy's rear is not yet strong. I feel it is necessary to dispatch part of our main forces to localities to the enemy's rear, to disperse them into companies to develop guerilla warfare. Our main force at the central and zonal levels should be limited to battalions; a battalion is not too small. The French consider a battalion "a small fighting contingent". Battles of battalion scale are appropriate for mobile guerilla warfare tactics. I propose a concrete formula: "Independent companies, concentrated battalions". Under the guiding principle put forth by Uncle Ho, the militia should constitute a source for replenishing our main force. When the local resistance movement is strong, our main force will operate elsewhere. The stronger the local force, the more effectively it will replenish the main force. In two or three years, guerilla warfare must develop all over the country. In that end, to win victory, we must certainly have a very strong main force."

Uncle Ho listened attentively, then he said, "The dispersion of part of the main force to develop guerilla warfare is very necessary. We shall not only send companies to the enemy's rear, but also to these regions where the hostilities will expand to in the future. The formula of "Independent companies, concentrated battalions" is appropriate for the current situation. The number of companies to be sent to the localities will be decided by the Standing Central Committee. Once a unanimous decision has been reached, it must be implemented at once."

The family of the host offered us a basket of cassava and some molasses.

Uncle Ho was smoking and meditative when he continued, "The enemy has sent in a large reinforcement, the war will expand and become more atrocious, our people will suffer a lot... For the autumn aid winter season this year, have the preparations been completed?"

I reported that instructions hid been sent to every locality, to which the scorched earth policy would be applied, food and other materials hidden, houses and gardens emptied, and key communication lines destroyed when the enemy arrived. In the country there were now over one million militiamen and guerrillas. 'he army had been strengthened and replenished throughout the summer and were ready to fight.

Sunday, May 19, 2013

When Hồ Chí Minh Collaborated with the US Imperialists

Hồ Chí Minh was born 19 May 1890. Happy Birthday Uncle Hồ!
The French are not quite so confident as they were at the start that this would be cleared up in a few weeks.
-- OSS agent in Việtnam, 1945
The Vietnamese fought a 30 year war of independence. It formally began when Hồ Chí Minh read the Vietnamese Declaration of Independence in Hanoi on 2 September 1945 and ended with the fall of Saigon on 30 April 1975. In succession, they fought Japan, Britain, France and the United States as the entire imperialist world combined to control and exploit them.

Against such titanic forces, victory would not have been possible had the Vietnamese communists not been willing to seek strength and advantage wherever it was to be found and build alliances of convenience even within the imperialist camp.

The first American to die in that 30 year long Việtnam War was Lt. Col Peter Dewey. He was a member of a seven man team from the US Office of Strategic Services (OSS) that arrived in Saigon on 4 September 1945 "to represent American interests." There was no Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) back then, the OSS was it. Later, when the cold war got going, it would become the CIA.

Dewey was shot dead by Việt Minh troops on 26 September 1945 in Saigon, and since, at the time, the OSS was working with the Việt Minh, he may also be considered the first US "friendly-fire" fatality of the Việtnam War, and since his body was never recovered, the first MIA as well.

Road rage may have been his undoing. The Việt Minh said that they mistook him for the enemy after he shook his fist and yelled something in French at 3 Việt Minh soldiers manning a Saigon checkpoint. Dewey had wanted to fly the US flag on his jeep so he could be easily identified at the many Việt Minh road blocks, but General Gracey, his commanding officer, forbid it, saying only the commanding officer had that privilege. Before he was shot, Dewey had worked with the Việt Minh to arrange the repatriation of 4,549 Allied POWs, including 240 from the US.

The French had put a price on his head and the British had told him to leave Việtnam. While his death at the hands of the Vietnamese was a accident, the French wanted him dead. According to George Wickes, another OSS Saigon team member that also had a price on his head:
I don't believe I was ever in any danger, but clearly Dewey was persona non grata on account of his sympathy with the Vietnamese cause. As a matter of fact, all members of our mission shared his views, and our messages to Washington predicted accurately what would eventually happen if France tried to deny independence to Việtnam.
George Wickes' writings of this time provide us a unique window into it. In a letter to his parents in October 1945, he wrote:
"I do have some very reassuring information from Hanoi (Việt Minh Headquarters). It seems they are well-organized and realistic with a cosmic view of things. But France is determined to keep Indochina, determined enough to send out 120,000 troops. My visit to Thủ Dầu Một also provided some information: that the Annamites [Vietnamese] have some military organization and that without the Japanese the task of clearing areas would be well-nigh impossible without large numbers. Also that the British have no great opinion of the French as soldiers. "A small percentage of Annamites are determined to sacrifice all and have a specific plan of action, but most of them, passively at least, want independence.

The French are not quite so confident as they were at the start that this would be cleared up in a few weeks. And I believe that, unless they always keep large garrisons and patrols everywhere, they will not be able to keep the country submissive as it was before. The Annamite's great advantage lies in the fact that he is everywhere, that he does not need to fight pitched battles or organize troops to be a threat and that no amount of reprisal can completely defeat him. I cannot say how it will end, but at least it will be a long time before Frenchmen can roam about the country with peace of mind."
The soldiers France rushed over to put down the independence movement were a real mixed bag, while some were Free French troops under the mistaken impression they were coming to help liberate Việtnam, others were ex-German soldiers, including SS, only recently released from the service of the Nazis.

George Wickes met Hồ Chí Minh in Hanoi:
He received us in his office in the governor-general's palace. As if to indicate his official role, he was wearing a military-style tunic, but wearing it modestly without any insignia to suggest that he was more than a private citizen. We had expected the interview to be in French, but to our surprise he spoke to us in English and reminisced about his experiences in the United States when he worked in restaurants in Boston or New York. When asked if he was a communist, he made no secret of the fact, but when asked if that meant Việtnam would become a communist country, he said he was not the one to determine that, for the political character of the country would have to be decided by the people. He spoke a good deal about the United States. He admired the principles of the Declaration of Independence, some of which he had paraphrased in declaring the independence of Việtnam the previous September 2. He wanted us to transmit to Washington his high hopes that the United States would aid Việtnam in its efforts to establish itself as an independent nation.
A few days later, Wickes described Hồ Chí Minh in a letter home. It is well worth quoting at length:
His pictures present him as an emaciated martyr with burning eyes. He looks like a martyr all right (and in fact is one, having devoted practically all of his 60-odd years to the cause of his country), but kindly rather than fanatic, like a benevolent grandfather for his people.

Short and very slight, a little stooped, with seamed cheeks and generally well-weathered features, wiry, grayish hair, a scraggly mandarin mustache and wispy beard-- all in all not a very imposing man physically.

But when you talk with him he strikes you as quite above the ordinary run of mortals. Perhaps it is the spirit that great patriots are supposed to have. Surely he has that -- long struggling has left him mild and resigned, still sustaining some small idealism and hope. But I think it is particularly his kindliness, his simplicity, his down-to-earthiness. I think Abraham Lincoln must have been such a man, calm, sane and humble.
The Politics of Indochina during World War II

The political-military landscape of what was then known as French-Indochina, and included Laos and Cambodia, as well as Việtnam, was very complicated during WWII, it made the one in Casablanca look simple. As a French colony it fell to Axis control after the fall of France in 1940. Occupied France controlled the north and Vichy France controlled the south with German supervision. Of course, Japan was the real Axis military power in the region but it was restrained from simply running roughshod over Việtnam because it was nominally a possession of an ally. That changed abruptly on V-E Day. The competing nationalist and communist movements in China also extended strong influences on regional affairs.

This was the situation into which the legendary director of the OSS, Brig. Gen. William "Wild Bill" Donovan parachuted his men. To this day much of CIA folklore harkens back to the days of "Donovan's Rangers." He was famous for his unorthodox methods and disregard for rules and the chain of command. When CINCPAC, Pacific Command, US Naval Intelligence, refused to work with the OSS, Donovan set about building his own intelligence networks in Asia, trading secrets for favors and favors for secrets wherever he could. Accordingly, he instructed his South-East Asian staff to use "anyone who will work with us against the Japanese, but do not become involved in French-Indochinese politics."

The Việt Minh emerged as a liberation movement under the leadership of Hồ Chí Minh and the Vietnamese communist party in the early 1940's. They were fighting against French colonialism as well as Japanese occupation. These strange circumstances meant for that moment, the US intelligence organization and the Vietnamese communists were natural allies. What is more, both groups were headed by men who could see the advantages and were willing push the envelope.

The relationship was actually initiated by the communists in December 1942 when a representative of the Việt Minh approached the US Embassy in China for help in getting Hồ Chí Minh out of a Chinese Nationalist prison. He had been caught with invalid documents.

Whatever the US did or didn't do, Hồ wasn't released until September 1943. A month after Hồ's release and return to Việtnam, in October 1943, a OSS memo called for the US to "use the Annamites [Vietnamese]…to immobilize large numbers of Japanese troops by conducting systematic guerrilla warfare in the difficult jungle country." The mission plan counseled that their most effective propaganda line was to tell them "that this war, if won by the Allies, will gain their independence."

In mid-1944 the OSS approached the Việt Minh for help with setting up intelligence networks for fighting the Japanese and rescuing downed American pilots. After the Axis retreat in Europe and the fall of the Vichy French government, the Japanese moved quickly to consolidate its hold on Việtnam by having Emperor Bao Dai proclaim an independent Việtnam on 11 March 1945 and announce his intention to cooperated with the Japanese. This brought an even greater sense of urgency to the developing OSS-Việt Minh cooperation. Also in March, when the Việt Minh rescued a US pilot who had been shot down in Việtnam, Hồ Chí Minh personally escorted him back to the US forces in Kunming. While he was there, Hồ Chí Minh met the legendary founder of the US volunteer group, the "Flying Tigers." and got an autographed photo. Maj. Gen. Claire Chennault was then commander of the Fourteenth Air Force.

27 April 1945, Captain Archimedes Patti, head of OSS in Kunming met with Hồ Chí Minh and got his permission to send an OSS team to work with Hồ and the Việt Minh and to gather intelligence on the Japanese.

OSS Deer Team members pose with Việt Minh leaders Hồ Chí Minh and Vo Nguyen Giap during training at Tan Trao in August 1945. Deer Team members standing, l to r, are Rene Defourneaux, (Hồ), Allison Thomas, (Giap), Henry Prunier and Paul Hoagland, far right. Kneeling, left, are Lawrence Vogt and Aaron Squires. (Rene Defourneaux
In July 1945, a six man OSS Special Operations Team Number 13, code-named "Deer," parachuted into the jungles near Hanoi with the mission of setting up guerrilla teams of 50 to 100 men to attack the railroad line running from Hanoi to Lang Son and thus slow down the Japanese movement into southern China. General Vo Nguyen Giap and 200 guerrilla fighters greeted them. One member of the OSS team was a weapons trainer. They intended to air drop in a supply of weapons for the Việt Minh and teach them to use them.

They found Hồ Chí Minh in a very bad way. He was very ill. Claude G. Berube quotes the OSS team leader in his Hồ Chí Minh and the OSS:
"Hồ was so ill he could not move from the corner of a smoky hut," Defourneaux said. Hồ didn't seem to have much time to live; Defourneaux heard it would not be weeks but days. "Our medic thought it might have been dysentery, dengue fever, hepatitis," he recalled. "While being treated by Pfc Hoagland, Hồ directed his people into the jungle to search for herbs. Hồ shortly recovered, attributing it to his knowledge of the jungle."
Some members of this team soon developed a close working relationship between themselves and Hồ and Giap. One, Thomas, was even using Hồ's recommendations for USAAF targets against the Japanese, which was in direct conflict with his OSS orders.

After they received supply drops in early August, the Deer team began small arms and weapons training for the communists. The weapons trained were on the M-1 and M-1 carbine, as well as mortars, grenades, bazookas and machine guns. The Japanese surrendered on 15 August and so the training mission was over almost before it began. The Deer Team gave the weapons to the Việt Minh and started making plans for their departure. This was no small matter because as late as 25 August, some Japanese in Indochina hadn't heard the word and were still fighting.

On the same day the Deer team left camp and started for the French provincial capital, Thai Nguyen, with General Giap and his troops, 16 August, the National People's Congress started in Tan Trao. On 27 August the congress elected Hồ Chí Minh the president of the provisional government.

A week later, on the same day MacArthur formally accepted the Japanese surrender aboard the Missouri, Hồ Chí Minh declared Vietnamese independence in Hanoi. OSS team members were there and photographed the event. The new Minister of the Interior Giap recognized the US contribution in his speech, a few days earlier OSS team members had joined with him and the Việt Minh in repelling a Japanese attack just 60 km. from Hanoi.

After the NATO intervention in the Libyan Revolution and the various requests for international aid by the Syrian revolutionaries, there has been a lot of discussion as to what does and doesn't constitutes a respectable deal with imperialist forces.

In light of this, I thought I'd use this 123rd birthday of Hồ Chí Minh to remind everyone that accepting weapons and training, and even air support from an imperialist power doesn't necessarily mean that the revolutionaries have sold out and can now safely be described as "puppets" or "proxies."

Most importantly, I would like to take this opportunity to remind everyone that a revolutionary who is unwilling to make use of contradictions among the imperialists and make precisely such "deals" as will benefit the revolution, is no real revolutionary.

Friday, June 8, 2012

Major Vietnam War makeover planned!

Follow clayclai on Twitter
As US capitalism continues to recede from its industrious past, it has come to rely all the more on financial manipulation and war making as the economic engines of the empire. Just as the military-industrial complex grows in significant so does the nation's perceptions about the Vietnam War because the experience of that war has played a central role in the development of an American opposition to all wars.

Therefore it is not surprising that the Obama administration has just launched a major campaign to prettify the Vietnam War. A PR campaign that is expected to last more than a decade and cost tens of millions of dollars was officially kicked off by President Obama on May 28th. From Jack A. Smith in the Activist Newsletter, June 7, 2012:
REVERSING THE VIETNAM WAR VERDICT

The Pentagon has just launched a multi-year national public relations campaign to justify, glorify and honor Washington's catastrophic, aggressive and losing war against Vietnam — America's most controversial and unpopular military conflict.

President Barack Obama opened the militarist event, which was overwhelmingly approved by Congress four years ago, during a speech at the Vietnam Wall on Memorial Day, May 28. The entire campaign, which will consist of tens of thousands of events over the next 13 years, is ostensibly intended to "finally honor" the U.S. troops who fought in Vietnam. The last troops were evacuated nearly 40 years ago.

However, I have already fashioned a powerful weapon with which to dispatch this latest attempt at Vietnam War revisionism - Vietnam: American Holocaust. [IMDB] Brave New Theaters

I started production on Vietnam: American Holocaust back in 2006 because I saw this coming in the new crop of Vietnam War docs designed to revise that history for a new generation. I cajoled Martin Sheen into narrating it because, when it comes to narrating an antiwar Vietnam doc, who you going to call? I put three years of my life and the little nest egg I had from selling my late mother's house into the project. Now I have a clue as to how Noah must have felt when the rain started to fall.

I found out last year that the great documentary filmmaker Ken Burns was working with PBS to give the Vietnam War the whole "Ken Burns" treatment with a new 12 hour documentary film series on the Vietnam War slated for broadcast in 2016. I've offered them my services, contacts and expertise in this area, and they said they would be in touch. That was months ago and that is the last I've heard from them. Now I suspect that the Ken Burns Vietnam doc is part of this pentagon Vietnam War makeover and they really aren't interested in telling the story the way I have told it.



Currently as many as 5000 people a day are watching my 90 minute doc, on YouTube, getting an anti-imperialist perspective on the Vietnam War and a real taste of its horror. It has only been on YouTube 14 months but is expected to reach the quarter-million mark in views this weekend, so Ken Burn and all will have some catching up to do.

I am now seeking funding and other support so that I can finish the sequel Vietnam: People's Victory and it would now seem that completion of that project is more important than ever!

Jack Smith continues on the Vietnam War Commemoration plans:
In reality, the unprecedented project — titled the Vietnam War Commemoration — will utilize the "pro-veteran" extravaganza to accomplish two additional and more long lasting goals:

• The first is to legitimize and intensify a renewed warrior spirit within America as the Pentagon emerges from two counter-productive, ruinously expensive and stalemated unjust wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and prepares for further military adventures in Asia, the Middle East and Africa. Within days of Obama's speech, for instance, Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta announced a big increase of U.S. Navy forces in the Pacific, a move obviously targeting China. At the same time the Obama Administration's drone wars are accelerating as the Oval Office's kill list expands, and the president engages in cyber sabotage against Iran.

• The second is to dilute the memory of historic public opposition to the Vietnam war by putting forward the Pentagon's censored account of the conflict in public meetings, parades and educational sessions set to take place across the nation through 2025. These flag-waving, hyper-patriotic occasions will feature veterans, active duty military members, government officials, local politicians, teachers and business leaders who will combine forces to praise those who fought in Vietnam and those on the home front who supported the war. There won't be much — if any — attention focused on the majority of Americans who opposed this imperialist adventure, except as a footnote describing how tolerant U.S. democracy is toward dissent.
This attempt at rewriting history in the name of the Vietnam veterans will also be powerfully opposed by those Vietnam veterans that learned from Vietnam how to love peace and hate war.

Veterans for Peace, which showed my film at its national convention and sells it on their website; Scott Camil, the decorated Vietnam vet that appears in my film and has been a strong supporter: Ron Kovic, who wrote & lived Born on the 4th of July, and, together with Martin Sheen, serves as honorary co-chair of my fund-raising committee; and all those who fought in the Vietnam war and came to oppose it, you will be called upon to serve your country once again because a battle royal is about to be joined for the Hearts & Minds of the American people.

Jack Smith also includes a strong critique of Obama's Memorial Day speech and brief refresher on the history of the Vietnam war in which he rebuts the nonsense. Read the full article at Activist Newsletter here.

Buy the Vietnam: American Holocaust DVD on Amazon. Help me complete the sequel. We still need a lot of help if we are to finish Vietnam: People's Victory. Support this work with a PayPal donation or [Click Here] to make your tax deductible Now! We can also accept checks made to "From the Heart" for tax deductible contributions. Send to Linux Beach Productions, 116 Rose Ave, #9, Venice, CA 90291