Featured Post

Man behind the Curtain for al-Qaeda in Syria is Assad

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad wanted the recent Geneva II peace conference to focus on terrorism. He says terrorism is the main problem a...

Thursday, May 1, 2014

The appeasement of Putin began in Syria

My hands-down favorite gangster movie is The Godfather and when we speak of Bashar al-Assad and Vladimir Putin we are definitely in gangster territory. There is a famous scene when Don Vito Corleone, the Godfather, realizes who his real nemesis is: “Tattaglia is a pimp. He never could have outfought Santino. But I didn't know until this day that it was Barzini all along.”

One day soon Obama will come to realize that Assad is a pimp and it has been Putin all along. There is a causal relationship between Obama's dismal and hesitate support for Assad's opposition over the past three years and the expansionist Putin he is now facing in Ukraine.

Without Putin's support, Assad would already be done in Syria. The Syrian Arab Army has seen so many defections to the Free Syria Army that Assad has had to rely heavily on long range weapons like artillery and aircraft to suppress the rebellion. With these he can strike everywhere, punish resistive communities, make liberated areas uninhabitable, and terrorize his people, all while utilizing a minimum of soldiers not easily in a position to defect. For more "hands on" military requirements, he has fallen back on ideologically driven gangs, foreign fighters and Hezbullah.

These are the forces that have sustained Assad against the massive and popular opposition of his people for more than three years, and these require a long tail of supplies and cash. Sustaining the kind of air campaign that has kept Assad in power requires a steady supply of munitions, fuel, repair parts and new aircraft. It requires someone with deep pockets that has a stomach for financing immense slaughter. And it requires someone in a position to veto effective United Nations action. It would not be possible without Putin.

While Iran has also provided considerable support to Assad, we can assume that this too has met with Putin's blessing and support. The same could be said about Hezbullah. We shouldn't need Vito Corleone to tell us who the "Barzini" is in this cast of characters. Putin has been Assad's enabler from the very beginning.

That should give Putin a great deal of influence over Assad. So, it is hard not to conclude that Putin has signed off on Assad's use of sarin poison, that he hasn't opposed Assad's indiscriminate use of artillery and barrel bombs, industrial sized murder and torture and all the other horrors we've seen from a man who is pimping Hezbullah and the jihadists so Putin can keep his naval base.

Putin could cut Assad's pipeline like that, and poof, he'd be gone, but instead he lingers on with the audacity to speak of electing himself to a third term as Syria's president. With slowed progress on his promise to give up his declared chemical weapon, we are confronted with a growing body of evidence that he is again using poison gas to kill. This time he is dropping the stuff out of war planes, which the opposition doesn't have. However, that doesn't stop Putin's consigliere, FM Lavrov, from again blaming the resistance for a chemical attack on itself and doing it with a straight face.

Now Lavrov's lies have spread from Syria to Ukraine. When he says with an equally straight face that the uniformly uniformed army brigades that took over Crimea weren't from Russia, he is relying on a tradition already set by the acceptance of his lies about Syria.

Who was it, really, that called Obama's red-line bluff back in August? Was it Assad or was it Putin? If Putin had prior knowledge of the attack and signed off on it, then it was Putin calling Obama's bluff. We do know that after the emptiness of Obama's threat had been exposed before all the world, it was Putin who opened a path of retreat for Obama, by brokering a chemical weapons deal that brought Assad in from the cold at the same time.

Since then, Putin has been on a roll, and so have his tanks. New fronts have opened up in Europe as Putin supplements his right to provide 'lawful' dictatorships with whatever they need to suppress their own people, with his "right" to intervene in a case were the government might dare used its army against its own people.

Putin has gotten to the place he is because he has already seen how little the West was willing to do stop his killer, his Luca Brasi, from slaughtering over a hundred thousand people, so he has that confidence moving forward.

The appeasement of Putin began in Syria and that is where it must end now. If the West wants to stop his relentless push before world war three breaks out, they must impose a no-fly zone over Syria and supply enough modern arms to the opposition to stop Assad in his tracks. With that message sent, they may then find sanctions an effective deterrent in Ukraine.


Click here for a list of my other blogs on Syria

3 comments:

  1. Yeah, and while we are at it, let's support the illegal take-over of governments by NED and its like as we march lock-step with Obama with our arms raised in salute. Like in Libya and elsewhere now the countries are in one big mess. Are they better off? Are we are better off? We have so many right-wing people that have taken advantage of prior US interventions to kill, kill, kill in their countries that we are in effect saying to the Nulands and people like them that just keep up intervening and staging revolutions so that the real elites in this country can take over the world. Quit marching in lock-step and wake up!

    ReplyDelete
  2. In point of fact, very few Libyans want to go back to the "good ole days" of the Qaddafi dictatorship.

    If you don't propose a solution to Assad killing babies your real attitude towards his Syrian victims is "Fuck those people."

    You live in a western centered CT fantasy world.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It is beyond ludicrous to think that Obama, the antipathy of martial zeal to the point of profound cowardice, is trying to take over anything other than our bank accounts. Even his lukewarm efforts in Libya were because Sarkozy dragged him kicking and screaming into making a commitment. Fantasy world indeed, one occupied by great shadows of paranoia and projection.

    ReplyDelete