Monday, June 18, 2018

The white-Left Part 1: The two meanings of white

My recent use of the term "white-Left" has generated enquiries from readers that deserve a detailed answer, so I cashed in 40 of my ETO hours to craft this one in two parts. Here is part one:

The failure of the [White] Left on racism is not to be mocked. It is a tragedy and the main problem holding back world revolution.
This, my response to a comment left on Louis Proyect's Marxism mailing list on 3 July 2016, four months before he banned me, may be the first time I used the phrase. I had been grappling for a descriptive term that would adequately describe the dominant section of what most people in the United States think of as the Left. This segment of the Left, which some refer to as "anti-imperialists" or "tankies," is actually so dominant as to be thought of by most people as representing the entire Left. I have never found those terms quite adequate, and I also think the "problem area" is much broader and includes many on the Left that conveniently "don't know" right from wrong on some of the stickier international questions, even after a half-million deaths. I also don't think those terms, and others, that reference their international positions, speak to the betrayal of Left leadership when a white supremacist cabal was mounting a successful campaign to capture executive power in the top imperialist country. But before I explain why I think the adjective white is the best one-word description of this dominant Left grouping, by a longshot, I want to lay some groundwork by looking at the dictionary definition of the word white.

Ask Google for a definition of white you get this:
1. of the color of milk or fresh snow, due to the reflection of most wavelengths of visible light; the opposite of black.
synonyms: colorless, unpigmented, bleached, natural; snowy, milky, chalky, ivory

2. belonging to or denoting a human group having light-colored skin (chiefly used of peoples of European extraction).
synonyms: Caucasian, European
Quite naturally, the first definition of white has been around as long as the English language has, longer actually, since it was handed down from the Old English "hwit," which was described as "a highly luminous color devoid of chroma." The second usage is much newer, less than 400 years old actually, so I want to begin by examining this first meaning of white, in some detail, before looking at the etymology of the application of that adjective to a selected group of people.

Look up white on you will find these additional definitions:
  • lacking color; transparent.
  • Older Use: Offensive. decent, honorable, or dependable
  • auspicious or fortunate.
  • morally pure; innocent.
  • without malice; harmless (white magic, white lie)
As we shall see, the association of white with decent, honorable, or dependable is entirely natural and appropriate, but is now considered offensive in light of the definition emerging capitalism added to the word. This is actually turning the problem on its head, a mistake I have also made, seeing racial undertones in names like angel food cake and devil's food cake, but I am getting ahead of my narrative. Look up white on; here are some of the synonyms you will find:
  • fair
  • neutral
  • transparent
  • immaculate
Second order synonyms [words for which white is considered a synonym] include dazzling, glowing, hot, virgin, virginal, untouched, spotless, fresh, clean, elegant, flawless, bright, unsoiled, and unblemished. Other word associations with white include enlighten, illuminate, brighten, flash, spotlight and highlight. Because of its association with daylight it also symbolizes dawn, new beginnings, birth, and life itself.

Malcolm X looks up black & white in the dictionary in the Spike Lee film.
We could can also add white knight, white wedding, whitewash, a white paper and white collar to the list of phrases where white is used to express positive values such as courage, innocence, cleanliness, authority, position or safety, or even to turn the negative around, as in white lie. On the other hand, black is used to convey negative values which are, often related to death or bad things; phrases like black death, black plague, black comedy, and black day. Antonyms for white from start with black, obviously, but also include dirty, prejudiced, gloomy, darkened, biased, obscure and dim.

There was a time, quite a long time actually, when I saw racial undertones in these associations, but not anymore!

For example, I have worked in IT for more than a half-century, and even now, in my day job as a Linux Systems Administrator, hardly a shift goes by that I'm not asked to whitelist or blacklist a group of IP addresses. Even though I know perfectly well that they are terms-of-art, until recently, I harbored a resentment in using them because I thought them examples of how racism had smuggled itself in the very core of the English language. Indeed, it has, but not in the way I originally thought.

The importance of symbols

As intelligent beings that organizes our mental world largely through the use of symbols, it is entirely right and proper that white has come to symbolize a host of positive characteristics, while its opposite, black, has come to symbolize negative ones.

What is more important is that these associations are 1.) immutable, 2.) primordial, and 3.) supra-cultural.

In their primary definitions, white and black represent colors, or more precisely, achromatic colors, because what we call white light is actually a combination of all the visible light of different colors, representing different wavelengths of electromagnetic energy, as they shine on Earth from our Sun. In that light are all the colors of the rainbow, but there is no white light save that which is produced by the combination of all of them. There are no white LEDs on your screen, just red, green, and blue ones. The white you see is an illusion.

Because color vision, as we know it, developed on this planet, it is what you might call "white-balanced" to these Earthly conditions. If we had developed on another planet, where the ratio of primary colors that reached us from the Sun made a different combination, say the "Red Planet," we might see things differently, and pink might be the new white!

Black, on the other hand, is no light at all, meaning also no colors; the absence of color or light. Although for the painter, the roles are reverse. She starts with a white base and leaves it blank to represent white and adds pigments of different colors to represent them. If she combines all the colors, she gets black. She is making an image to reflect light. Where it reflects red, we see red; where it reflects yellow, we see yellow; where it reflects all, we see white; where it reflects none, we see black.

Certain symbolic associations with white such as "neutrality" and "transparency" follow naturally from its role in human vision, just as other symbolic associations, such as "shadowy" and "gloomy," are made with black.

Here are some basic facts about light, and how it is perceived by the human eye. Visible light is electromagnetic radiation within a certain portion of the electromagnetic spectrum that is detectable by the human eye. The wavelength, which is the inverse of frequency, determines the color we see the light as. Here are some familiar colors and their specs:





~ 700–635 nm

~ 430–480 THz


~ 635–590 nm

~ 480–510 THz


~ 590–560 nm

~ 510–540 THz


~ 560–520 nm

~ 540–580 THz

The seven colors of the rainbow are red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, violet and their wavelengths range from 780 nanometers to 390 nanometers. What we call white isn't one of the colors of the rainbow, in fact white is not a primary color at all.

Both white and black as well as the grey areas between them are called achromatic colors, literally, colors without color. What Wikipedia says about white is useful to our discussion:
An incoming light to the human eye that stimulates all its three types of color sensitive cone cells in nearly equal amounts results in white. White is one of the most common colors in nature, the color of sunlight, snow, milk, chalk, limestone and other common minerals. In many cultures white represents or signifies purity, innocence, and light, and is the symbolic opposite of black, or darkness. According to surveys in Europe and the United States, white is the color most often associated with perfection, the good, honesty, cleanliness, the beginning, the new, neutrality, and exactitude.[2]
Another feature that flows exclusively from this physics of light, and the chemistry of our planet, is that many things appear white. Wherever all the Sun's rays are scattered and diffused, we see white. The Earth is abundant with clear substances, meaning they transmit light of all wavelengths equally, like water. Whenever the water molecules are arranged in a way that diffuses sunlight, whether in snow, clouds, or seafoam, we see white. Except if the seafoam is a little too off-white, we may have second thoughts about going for a swim.

This brings us to another category of positive symbols that white intrinsically represents, those having to do with purity, innocence, cleanliness, and harmlessness. One reason for that is that when clear substances form crystals the whiteness of the result can be taken as a useful measure of its purity. We know that when something that is supposed to be white isn't we have a problem. The whiteness of the sugar, salt, milk, or snow, may not be absolute proof of its purity, but it's a pretty good clue, and a way to use our color vision to increase our chances of survival.

A third category of symbolic associations with white is probably the most important for our discussion, and includes such varied concepts as safety, innocence, virginal, fresh, clean, dazzling, fortunate, enlighten, illuminate, and brighten. All this is owing largely to our species-wide adherence to the Circadian rhythm. We are creatures most active in daylight. While many other animals rely much more on the daylight-agnostic senses of hearing and smell, we are somewhat deficient there. With color vision and range-finding ability, it is our seeing ability that makes what Karl Marx called "the natural day" the period of greatest activity.

Native American wisdom
If bats think in symbols, black may represent safety to them, and white -- danger; but we are daytime creatures. We are quite naturally up with the Sun and most active in daylight. It's only relatively recently that electrification has driven us to attempt to operate around the clock. Compared to many other animals, humans just don't see very well at night. But what we lose in night vision is more than made up for by having eyes that are sensitive to colors. Most animals can't see colors. Because of our poor night vision, humans are not nocturnal hunters or gatherers. We feel safest during the day. Night has always been the period of greatest danger, a time when we retreat to whatever security and shelter we can manage to await the rising Sun, and our next day's activities.

No doubt, these basic features of human life predate even our emergence at the top of the primate pyramid. Millions of years ago, before we were modern humans even, we cowered in fear of the night someplace, and welcomed the birth of each new dawn with gladness.

As you can see, these synonyms, or symbiotic relationships, between the polar opposites of white and black are intrinsic, primeval, immutable, and supra-cultural. That is why white has come to symbolize "good" and black has come to symbolize "bad;" it's why we "whitelist" the Internet addresses we want to let in, and "blacklist" those that we want to block. It would be ludicrous to expect the language to have developed differently. That's not the problem.

White's second meaning

We are now ready to look at the etymology of the second dictionary definition of the word white, the one that has come to be applied to a certain group of humans, not because the color of their skin matches the white of everyone's eyeballs, but, ostensibly, because they are a lighter shade of brown, as in "white people." This is what the Online Etymology Dictionary has to say about this meaning of white:
Meaning "white man, person of a race distinguished by light complexion" is from 1670s; white man in this sense is from 1690s.
As you can see, as compared to the first prehistoric meaning of white, this second one is of a relatively recent vintage. In point of fact, it was "coined" during that period of rising capitalism and colonization in the soon-to-become United States, as part of a larger effort to break the solidarity that was being created so long as English and African labored together under the common bondage of indentured servitude. It was invented in the thirteen colonies and then exported back to Europe.

There was an economic crisis in young America in the last half of the 17th century that brought to the fore the class differences between the working poor and a handful of "grantees." African and European laborers fought together, often with arms, against the colonial powers and the landowners. In Virginia there were at least 10 popular or servile revolts between the 1663 Servants’ plot for an insurrectionary march to freedom, to the tobacco riots of 1682. In Bacon’s Rebellion, 1676, an army of European and African bond-servants and freedman recently “out of their time” captured and burned the colonial capital of Jamestown, which Governor Berkeley left in a hurry. It took 1100 British troops sent from England in 11 ships to put him back, and they took a while to get there.

Nathaniel Bacon confronts Governor William Berkeley at the Statehouse in Jamestown
Initially they enslaved almost everybody under the system of indentured servitude; the English, Irish, African, even indigenous. Three-quarters of all slaves in Virginia around the time of Bacon's rebellion, 1676, were European. Governor Berkeley estimated that about 1,500 European chattel bond-laborers arrived in Virginia that year, "the majority English, with a few Scots and fewer Irish."

Karl Marx pointed out in Capital, Volume 1, that importing labor from Europe wasn't working out that well for them, a cheaper and more subservient labor force had to be created by artificial means:
The supply of wage labour, he [E.G. Wakefield] complains, is neither constant, nor regular, nor sufficient. “The supply of labour is always not only small but uncertain.” [13] “Though the produce divided between the capitalist and the labourer be large, the labourer takes so great a share that he soon becomes a capitalist.... Few, even those whose lives are unusually long, can accumulate great masses of wealth.” [14] The labourers most distinctly decline to allow the capitalist to abstain from the payment of the greater part of their labour. It avails him nothing, if he is so cunning as to import from Europe, with his own capital, his own wage-workers. They soon “cease... to be labourers for hire; they... become independent landowners, if not competitors with their former masters in the labour-market.” [15] Think of the horror! The excellent capitalist has imported bodily from Europe, with his own good money, his own competitors! The end of the world has come! No wonder Wakefield laments the absence of all dependence and of all sentiment of dependence on the part of the wage-workers in the colonies. On account of the high wages, says his disciple, Merivale, there is in the colonies “the urgent desire for cheaper and more subservient labourers — for a class to whom the capitalist might dictate terms, instead of being dictated to by them.... In ancient civilised countries the labourer, though free, is by a law of Nature dependent on capitalists; in colonies this dependence must be created by artificial means.” [16]
This labor situation posed a serious dilemma for the new colonial masters of young America, and at the very time when they needed to greatly increase the labor available to them to exploit the vast resources of the colonies. They needed a class of workers that would be denied the independence and upward mobility made possible by so much free land. They had already been busy passing laws that facilitated extending a bond-servant's time. That was their favorite punishment for any offense, especially running away. They were toying with the idea of perpetual servitude for all, but the revolts were showing that just wasn’t going to work within the existing framework.

That is when the colonial bourgeoise hit upon the strategy of greatly elaborating the racist policies they had pioneered against the Irish, and applying them to all Africans in America, while simultaneously bringing all Europeans together under the banner of whiteness. They started using an obvious difference in a really minor physical attribute, i.e. skin color, to divide the workers between those that could work off their servitude and those that couldn’t, and they started to pass laws accordingly. There was a whole wave of legislation that followed, and they created the structure of racism and racial slavery where none had existed before. With this legal structure evolved the ideology and the practice of white supremacy.

They were replacing the earlier labor system with a system of racial slavery, in which the support of the laborers from England, Ireland and other parts of Europe was purchased by their elevation from bondsman to wage slaves. They created and carefully cultivated this new concept of all light-skinned European nationalities grouped together as a single "white people" or "white race" over the better part of a century because like greedy bosses everywhere, they are happy to forgo a real raise when a shiny new title would do.

Foreign correspondents, like Morgan Godwyn in 1680, "found it necessary to explain" to their European readers that "white people" was the new term for Englishmen or Christians over here. It could truly be said that the European colonists came to the "New World" and sent back "white people" as part of their produce.

The co-opting of white as a common label for the imperialists and a part of the oppressed was a historic marketing coup in an era in which the recent invention and growth of printing was making mass marketing an art the capitalists were learning to exploit. The first newspaper was published in 1609, just four years before the term "white people" was coined; the first newspaper ad was published in the US in 1704, just one year before the Virginia Slave Codes of 1705 marked the consolidation of the slave system in the South. A lot of ad revenue would be made selling slaves in the coming centuries. In the intervening period, this new technology, the first to make mass propaganda available to the ruling class, would play an indispensable role in selling the mythology of white people. BTW, press is another word that has acquired a new meaning over time, although in this case the connection is more organic. The original printing press actually was a press, designed much like a punch press or a wine press. Its usage never had to be mandated by law.

The Slave Codes made the new definition of white a legal term, although for clarity they still couldn't use it without a synonym. They used it in doling out a first white privilege:
That all masters and owners of servants...shall not, at any time, give immoderate correction; neither shall, at any time, whip a christian white servant naked, without an order from a justice of the peace: And if any, notwithstanding this act, shall presume to whip a christian white servant naked, without such order... [shall pay] ...forty shillings sterling.
While at the same time it took away their right to marry freely. You will notice it had not yet branded the African as black:
And for a further prevention of that abominable mixture and spurious issue, which hereafter may increase in this her majesty's colony and dominion, as well by English, and other white men and women intermarrying with negroes or mulattos, as by their unlawful coition with them, Be it enacted, by the authority aforesaid, and it is hereby enacted, That whatsoever English, or other white man or woman, being free, shall intermarry with a negro or mulatto man or woman, bond or free, shall, by judgment of the county court, be committed to prison, and there remain, during the space of six months, without bail or mainprize; and shall forfeit and pay ten pounds current money of Virginia, to the use of the parish, as aforesaid.
Tobacco plantation
Subsequent laws, and not only in Virginia, would restrict a host of rights to people identified as white. While it is generally remembered how these pre-"Jim Crow" laws were used against people of color, particularly after slavery was ended, their initial role in forcing a white identity on to the European immigrant is generally forgotten, but once only whites had the right to own property, for example, being identified as white became much more important than one's identification with one's country of origin. The racist laws forced anyone who could be identified as white to apply for membership.

It has been said that white people have no culture. What is true is that often the rich English, Italian, Irish, Scottish, Greece, French or German culture of their ancestors was lost when the they joined the great American melting pot of white people, and they have received very little in return. Sometimes it is so lost they need a DNA test to get it back! Well, the banishment of the color line forced by the civil rights movement is seen by all as granting new freedoms to people of color. It is less well recognized that it also gives the freedom to people of European ancestry to stop calling themselves white and join the people of color [which they truly are anyway] without incurring any penalty for doing so.

Jesus Christ wasn't always portrayed as white. This image of Christ with a Lamb found in the Catacomb of Callistus is from the 3rd century, and probably truer to any historical reality than the ones produced after the church went over to white supremacy.
After they invented the concept of white people, they proceeded to rewrite history so that the history of western civilization became the history of white people. In the real Greek cradle of western civilization skin color was unimportant. What mattered was were you lived. The classical historian James H. Dee said "the Greeks do not describe themselves as 'white people'—or as anything else because they had no regular word in their color vocabulary for themselves."

Since facts can't be allowed to get in the way of a good con, in spite of the fact the King Sargon, Plato, Aristotle, Caesar, Claudius, Charlemagne, the Vikings, Pope Urban II and the Christians that marched east in the Crusades never called themselves white, they were all posthumously awarded the title of "white." Accordingly, Adam and Eve were white, and since God made them in his image, God must be white too. Printing made the mass production of books to spread this new mythology possible for the first time in history. Conveniently, 1640 became the first year a book was published in British North America.

Adam & Eve
Every good con relies on a grain-of-truth that allows it to claim credibility. Sorensen says "a lie must have narrow plausibility." The grain-of-truth in the "white people" lie, perhaps the most destructive con ever played on humanity, is that Europeans have less melatonin in their skin than other humans. The claim is that shows they embody all the positive characteristics that are traditionally, and correctly, associated with the color white, and are superior to the excluded people, thereby rendered black. That this is the racist association being made is shown clearly by the slur "That's mighty white of you." If it didn't combine both meanings of white into one usage, there would be no reason to call it offensive.

They made use of the relatively lighter skin color of the Europeans to label themselves “white” with all the righteous symbolism that implies, precisely to cover the perpetration of the blackest crimes ever done to humanity and the planet. White supremacy was born of this master stroke of false symbolism. The only thing white about white people are their teeth and their eyeballs, just like everyone else. The very concept of "white people" was invented as a method of social control and racial domination.

White supremacy also involves the creation of an artificial schism between humanity and nature. The racist monkey meme, and Trump's favorite, calling us animals, is grounded in the false conception that white men aren't animals. As long as they were Englishmen, Irish, Scottish, French, German and Russian, they, like all living organisms that aren't plant-like, were animals. Once they took on the mantle of sunlight, they thought of themselves as Gods, the masters of all. This doesn't make the animal meme any less demeaning and dangerous, since it opens the door to our extermination as if we were live stock or vermin.

There are many good books that cover this history in great detail. I would recommend both The Invention of the White Race by Theodore W. Allen, and The History of White People by Nell Irvin Painter.

In The Price of the Ticket, James Baldwin talked about how early on Africans and Europeans suffered similarly and how the "white race" was created in the United States:
They come through Ellis Island, where Giorgio became Joe, Pappavasiliu becomes Palmer, Evangelos becomes Evans, Goldsmith becomes Smith or Gold, and Avakian becomes King. So, with a painless change of name, and in the twinkling of an eye, one becomes a white American.

The Irish middle passage, for but one example, was as foul as my own, and as dishonorable on the part of those responsible for it. But the Irish became white when they got here and began rising in the world, whereas I became black and began sinking.
James Baldwin
The price the white American paid for his ticket was to become white--; and, in the main, nothing more than that, or, as he was to insist, nothing less. This incredibly limited not to say dimwitted ambition has choked many a human being to death here: and this, I contend, is because the white American has never accepted the real reasons for his journey. I know very well that my ancestors had no desire to come to this place: but neither did the ancestors of the people who became white...
Frantz Fanon commented on the effects of this alienation in Black Skin, White Masks:
"The white man is desperately trying to achieve the rank of man...The white man is locked in his whiteness."

The 400th birthday of white people

The four-hundredth anniversary of the birth of "white people" occurred less than five years ago, 29 October 2013, and it passed silently, with no celebration, or even recognition, as far as I know. Ed Simon told us "How ‘white people’ were invented by a playwright in 1613:"
The Jacobean playwright Thomas Middleton invented the concept of ‘white people’ on 29 October 1613, the date that his play The Triumphs of Truth was first performed. The phrase was first uttered by the character of an African king who looks out upon an English audience and declares: ‘I see amazement set upon the faces/Of these white people, wond’rings and strange gazes.’ As far as I, and others, have been able to tell, Middleton’s play is the earliest printed example of a European author referring to fellow Europeans as ‘white people.’
This may well have been the first usage of the term "white people," although it didn't come into general usage until much later, and didn't even make it into the English Oxford Dictionary until the mid-1600's, according to James H. Dee. It's interesting that while this English playwright may have invented the term, in his fiction, he has an African introduce it to the world as a bouquet to his English audience, and while I know nothing else about this play other than what is contained in the quote above, its title "The Triumphs of Truth" might make a suitable cultural vehicle for associating the first, and at that time, only, definition of white and whiteness with a people, especially if the triumphs being referred to was the concurrent European rape of Africa, and the "truth" was a lie, attempting to wrap itself in the gowns of righteousness and enlightenment by labeling themselves as white and their victims "black."

A little research seems to confirm my suspicions. The Map of London Critical Introduction states:
Unity in The Triumphs of Truth is also achieved by using simple imagery -- light to represent good and dark to represent evil. Truth’s Angel is wearing white silk which is powdered with stars of gold and Truth is adorned in white satin, and wears a diadem of stars, while Error wears ash-colour silke.

Taking the conflict of the light/dark imagery a step further are the Moors. The King of the Moors makes reference to his dark face, but states that Truth in [his] soul sets up the light of grace. It seems that this King of Moors and his queen had been converted to Christianity by English merchants traveling in their land, and they rejoice in their new found religion. As well as setting up a hierarchy with Good over Evil, in this scene of The Triumphs of Truth a hierarchy is created with Christian over Pagan.
This is a revelation. Since the Moors, as Muslims, were considered Pagan, it would seem that an unhealthy dose of Islamophobia, as well as anti-African racism, was involved in the creation of the concept of white people.

Less than a year ago, the New York Times ran an informative piece that outlined what modern science tells us about skin color:
Humans develop color much as other mammals do. Special cells in the skin contain pouches, called melanosomes, packed with pigment molecules. The more pigment, the darker the skin.

Skin color also varies with the kind of pigments: Melanosomes may contain mixtures of a brown-black called eumelanin and a yellow-red called pheomelanin.

To find the genes that help produce pigments, scientists began by studying people of European ancestry and found that mutations to a gene called SLC24A5 caused cells to make less pigment, leading to paler skin.
This is what it said about why skin color varies so widely:
Living humans come packaged in a wide range of hues — from pale and freckly in Ireland to dark brown in southern India, Australia and New Guinea. Researchers have argued that these varying colors evolved partly in response to sunlight.

The idea is that people who live with intense ultraviolet light benefited from dark color, pigments that shielded important molecules in their skin. In places with less sunlight, people needed lighter skin, because they were able to absorb more sunlight to make vitamin D.
As you can see, nothing in the science of skin colors indicates that the positive attributes we associate with white fall more on people with lighter skin or makes them more Godlike.

One might call it a "brilliant" move to make use of a lower level of melatonin in the skin of people adapted to the available sunlight in the northern hemisphere to grab the label white, with all its embedded positive symbolism, for a group of capitalists at a time when they are rallying forces for the imperialist subjugation of the planet, but the title is an illegitimate one. It was born of slavery, and white supremacy can never be defeated as long some people continue to insist that as compared to the rest of humanity, that they are “white.”

White supremacy is a danger to the Earth

While the skin color differences between the European colonizers, and the people of the southern hemisphere may have provided the original impetus for the white and black categorization, the adoption of the symbolism of white by Europeans at the beginning of the imperialist period has been used not only as a sign of their righteousness in dominating and raping the thereby newly created "non-white" people, it has been used as a sign of their righteousness in dominating and raping the entire planet. Therefore, we can conclude that the problems inherent in a group of people being called white is not merely a race problem. It would be a problem even if there were no other people. This attitude of whiteness has been invoked not just against the "black people of the Earth" but against the Earth itself.

The array of political forces around the climate change debate is but one example of how white supremacy isn't just an attack on the better part of humanity, but on nature itself. At first glance, the global warming question has nothing to do with race, and one would think that even the most extreme racist, that envision an earthly future free of people of color, would still be fighting to see that the Earth did have a future, if only for white people, and yet there they all are, firmly on the denial side of climate change.

White chauvinism therefore is the practice of white supremacy, not just towards the excluded peoples, but towards the entire excluded natural world. It underlines and legitimizes the operations of capitalism not just in exploiting "people of color," but in ruthlessly exploiting the resources of the Earth as well.
  • White racism is inseparable from the notion that a certain people are white.
  • Racism is the application of white chauvinism to people.
  • White nationalism is the derivative belief that white people constitute a nation.
The late Joel Kovel addressed some of the deeper cultural and psychological aspects of this question in his classic work "White Racism A Psychohistory." Here is some of what he had to say:
Racism abstracts the color of the living body into non-colors of extreme value, black and white. Within this organization black represents the shade of evil, the devil's aspect, night, separation, loneliness, sin, dirt, excrement, the inside of the body; and white represents the mark of good, the token of innocence, purity, cleanliness, spirituality, virtue, hope.p.232
The problem of racism is part of the problem of Western culture. And thus, its central aspect is not that blackness whose many meanings we touched upon in the previous chapter, but its cognate, whiteness. For the world is neither black nor white, but hued. A lightly-hued people, aided perhaps by fantasies derived from their skin color--came to dominate the entire world, and in the process defined themselves as white. The process that generated this white power also generated the fear and dread of black.

People of all cultures have always been afraid of darkness, Children certainly are, and doubtless they have been since Paleolithic times. What has distinguished the West from other cultures is that these elementary issues. without losing their infantile core, have taken on a fantastic elaboration: They have been employed systematically and organically in the generation of power. p 95
That is what "white power" really is. It is the fraudulent application of the happy symbolism of white to a lightly-hued people for the purpose of turning an illusion of supremacy into a reality of world domination.

Kovel also wrote about how the primary symbolic references to white and black are skillfully mobilized at the deepest psychological level to perpetrate racist mythology:
Thus, for the black to fit into the into the aversive equations, he must be made into the affirmation of the excremental body. He must become the double negative of anality. the fantasy of a fantasy — not cold, pure, clean, efficient, industrious, frugal, rational (that is, not the pantheon of anal- negative ego traits which are the summum bonum of the bourgeois order) but rather warm, dirty, sloppy, feckless, lazy, improvident and irrational, all those traits that are associated with blackness, odor, and sensuality to make their bearer worthy of aversion.
In this passage, James Baldwin is explaining how African Americans learn to perceive the world. You can see the power that these two labels play in seeming to give racial oppression an intrinsic and God-given power. That should surprise no one. One label was appropriated by the slave owners, who forced the other label on the slaves, for precisely that reason:
This world is white and they are black. White people hold the power, which means that they are superior to blacks (intrinsically, that is: God decreed it so), and the world has innumerable ways of making this difference known and felt and feared.
The whitening of Venice

I hold in my hand an example of how the symbolism of the first meaning of white is used in my own community to empower the white supremacy embodied in its second meaning. It is a business card given to me by one of the private cops the newly created Venice Beach Business Improvement District [BID] has hired. BID is the business/government partnership that is heading up the gentrification of Venice. These private cops will soon learn a few African Americans in this neighborhood still have homes. They claim to be hired to help the police by watching out for stuff, but their real job is to drive out the homeless, which are disportionately people of color. The card these agents of white supremacy hand out have only two words below the BID logo on one side, and those two words are "CLEAN & SAFE."

The late Jalal Mansur Nuriddin of the Last Poets summed the problem up this way "The white man's got a God complex." That God Complex begins with the false claim that they are the color of sunlight.

From this we can see that the very terms "white race" and "white people" have inherently racist content. Therefore, racism can never be completely defeated before the use of these terms is abandoned.

The white-Left

Now that we have explored a little of complex and multifaceted role of the adjective white, I am prepared to explain why I think it the best adjective to apply to a section of the Left that currently dominates it. To be continued in part 2.

Syria is the Paris Commune of the 21st Century!

Click here for our posts on the 2016 US Election
Click here for a list of our other blogs on Syria
Click here for a list of our other blogs on Libya

Tuesday, June 5, 2018

Why did this #MeToo ending to the Titanic get sunk?

Even those few who never saw Titanic, 1997, knows it was about its sinking, but they may not be familiar with the love triangle that provided the human interest angle. That was composed of Cal Hockley, a rich aristocrat played by Billy Zane, Rose Dewitt Bukater, the daughter of a newly bankrupted aristocratic mother played by Kate Winslet, and Jack Dawson, the poor working class hero, played by Leonardo diCaprio. As the ill-fated voyage is coming to its end, we find Cal telling Rose that he intends to force sex on her that night. Then, when those plans are interrupted by the sinking, he ends up stealing a gun, and chasing Rose and Jack through the sinking Titanic while shooting at them.

There is a final meeting between Rose and Cal on the Carpathia that was in the screenplay written by James Cameron that is missing from the award winning movie. In The Titanic, Cal searches the rescue ship Carpathia for Rose. One of the reasons he is looking for her is that he realized that a very valuable diamond, the Heart of the Ocean, was in the coat he had put on her earlier. Rose is there, but he never finds her. That is the case even in this extended version of the Carpathia scene that shows many cut sections:

However, in Cameron's screenplay they do meet on the Carpathia and there is this final dramatic dialog between them:
You won't find any of your people back here, sir. It's all steerage.
Cal ignores him and goes amongst this wrecked group, looking under shawls and blankets at one bleak face after another.

Rose is sipping hot tea. Her eyes focus on him as he approaches her. He barely recognizes her. She looks like a refugee, her matted hair hanging in her eyes.

Yes, I lived. How awkward for you.

Rose... your mother and I have been looking for you--

She holds up her hand, stopping him.

Please don't. Don't talk. Just listen. We will make a deal, since that is something you understand. From this moment you do not exist for me, nor I for you. You shall not see me again. And you will not attempt to find me. In return I will keep my silence. Your actions last night need never come to light, and you will get to keep the honor you have carefully purchased.

She fixes him with a glare as cold and hard as the ice which changed their lives.

Is this in any way unclear?

(after a long beat)
What do I tell your mother?

Tell her that her daughter died with the Titanic.
She stands, turning to the rail. Dismissing him. We see Cal stricken with emotion.

You're precious to me, Rose.

Jewels are precious. Goodbye, Mr. Hockley.

That was the last time I ever saw him. He married, of course, and inherited his millions. The crash of 28 hit his interests hard, and he put a pistol in his mouth that year.

[I have made bold the cut sections]
While Rose doesn't make clear what shameful "actions last night" she is referring too, it's easy to imagine rape or attempted rape. In any case, clearly Rose had escaped, not only from the sinking Titanic, but also a much slower drowning in an abusive marriage. I know Titanic is still very long, and probably many good scenes had to be cut, but I think it's a real shame that this final reckoning between Rose and Cal was cut, especially in the light of the new consciousness about sexual abuse and the appropriate response brought about by the #MeToo movement. Titanic was already a good movie, this cut scene would have made it better.

By Clay Claiborne

Syria is the Paris Commune of the 21st Century!

Click here for our posts on the 2016 US Election
Click here for a list of our other blogs on Syria
Click here for a list of our other blogs on Libya

Sunday, June 3, 2018

Google decision to end military AI drone work reboots old memories

A major US corporation, arguably the richest and most powerful on the planet, has just adopted an explicitly anti-war decision to not renew a contract that would involve using artificial intelligence [AI] to kill people. It did this, in large part, because of opposition from its employees. Although the workers, like Google, stood to benefit economically, they rejected it on moral grounds. THIS IS HUGE! The application of AI to the art of war, which is the business of killing people, is one of the most dangerous technological frontiers facing us. It is the scientific nightmares of "Terminator" and "The Matrix" engineered into the living world. This nightmare future can only be created if the techie proletariat, the only ones capable of creating it, allow their skills to be manipulated by the masters of war to this end.

Now Google, propelled by its workers, has reversed an earlier decision that was pushing them, and us, closer to that dark future. It is understandable that this news has receive little attention in the corporate-owned media, but those on the Left should be demanding the same, or better, from all the other tech giants. Friday CNET reported:
Google reportedly not renewing contract for Project Maven drone program

Backlash against the company's involvement in the project led to the decision, according to Gizmodo.

By Abrar Al-Heeti
Google reportedly won't seek another contract for Project Maven, a Pentagon pilot AI program that could be used for drone strikes.

Google Cloud CEO Diane Greene made the announcement at a Friday employee meeting, people familiar with the matter told Gizmodo. Strong backlash against the company's involvement in the project reportedly led to the company's decision not to continue to pursue the project. Greene said Google decided to work on Project Maven "at a time when Google was more aggressively pursuing military work," Gizmodo reported.

According to BuzzFeed News, Greene said "We've always said this was an 18-month contract that we did, so it ends in March of 2019." She added, "There will be no follow-on to Maven." More...
Gizmodo covered this in story in greater detail, owing to their access to internal Google emails:
Google Plans Not to Renew Its Contract for Project Maven, a Controversial Pentagon Drone AI Imaging Program

By Kate Conger
1 June 2018
Google will not seek another contract for its controversial work providing artificial intelligence to the U.S. Department of Defense for analyzing drone footage after its current contract expires.

Google Cloud CEO Diane Greene announced the decision at a meeting with employees Friday morning, three sources told Gizmodo. The current contract expires in 2019 and there will not be a follow-up contract, Greene said. The meeting, dubbed Weather Report, is a weekly update on Google Cloud’s business.

Google would not choose to pursue Maven today because the backlash has been terrible for the company, Greene said, adding that the decision was made at a time when Google was more aggressively pursuing military work. The company plans to unveil new ethical principles about its use of AI next week. A Google spokesperson did not immediately respond to questions about Greene’s comments.

Google’s decision to provide artificial intelligence to the Defense Department for the analysis of drone footage has prompted backlash from Google employees and academics. Thousands of employees have signed a petition asking Google to cancel its contract for the project, nicknamed Project Maven, and dozens of employees have resigned in protest.

Google, meanwhile, defended its work on Project Maven, with senior executives noting that the contract is of relatively little value and that its contribution amounts merely to providing the Defense Department with open-source software.

But internal emails reviewed by Gizmodo show that executives viewed Project Maven as a golden opportunity that would open doors for business with the military and intelligence agencies. The emails also show that Google and its partners worked extensively to develop machine learning algorithms for the Pentagon, with the goal of creating a sophisticated system that could surveil entire cities. More...
Linux Hardware Partners T-Shirt ~ 1997 while Linux
was still in the "ignore you/laugh at you" stage.
A kind of class warfare has gone on at Google over many questions. It appears that for now the less greedy, more ethical side has won something on this one. That Google would take the lead on this, among the tech giants, would surprise few in the IT world. Google has not yet drifted that far from its Free Software Movement roots. Google was the product of the Linux community, and even today runs on Linux. Google became the principal financial sponsor of another Linux-based Open Source Software [OSS] project, Android, that short-stopped Apple's plans to monopolize the emerging smartphone market.

Google came out of a research project done by Larry Page and Sergey Brin when they were graduate students at Stanford. The project was nicknamed "Backrub," written in Java and Python, themselves open source projects, and run on Linux servers at These were the early days for Linux. It was less than five years old.

with Linus Torvalds - 1996
About the same time Page and Brin were sending their first project web crawlers out to explore and catalog the Internet in March 1996, I was founding the first Linux Users group in Los Angeles. I was president of Linux Users, Los Angeles [LULA] for eight years.

While the focus was on the developing an open alternative to Microsoft world domination, the social and political implications of the technology we were promoting was always a part of the discussion. In 1999 we help launched one of the first websites designed to reconnect refugee families in response to what was happening in Kosovo. We were able to do this by networking with Linux users worldwide connected through Linux International, and since I am digging through old papers and emails that have no record on the Internet, this is the core of the argument I made to get things rolling, 15 April 1999:
Kosovo: The pen is mightier than the sword.

And it was printing that gave the pen that power. Well the PC is the modern pen and the Internet is the publisher. I’m not saying that occasionally the sword isn’t necessary, as I believe it is in the present instance. I merely want to point to the enormous power of information technology in the sphere (spear) of war. The Serbia government understands this. Just look at their website:
“The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia recognizes and guarantees the rights of the members of the national minorities to the preservation, development and expression of their ethnic, cultural, language and other specific features, and the use of their national symbols, in accordance with the International law”
Yea, right. Goebbels never had it so good. In the face of their acts on the ground, these lies in cyberspace cannot go unopposed. Fortunately for us, it is not just governments who can set up websites. I think Dan summed up the two things that we are well equipped to do:
“1. carrying out a campaign of public education to educate the average Serb about the human costs of ethnic cleansing, and
2. documenting on video as much of what Serbia is doing as possible, and showing it to the Serb people.”
Certainly we can put together a website (or provide technical assistance to others) that exposes what is really going on. Facts can be presented as documents, reports, photos, sound and video. I agree with John on how this could be done. And certainly we can enter into a dialog with the enemy. If we can email them and can post to discussion groups, we can get our point of view heard. Sure our posters may be quickly torn down by the opposition, but its easy enough to re-post them.

I also know that it is almost impossible to charge hearts and minds of people given over to ethnic hatred. I’ve run into Southerners who are still fighting the Civil War, and these Serbs are still fighting a war that took place over 600 years ago. But I personally believe that the only ultimate salvation of humanity lies overcoming precisely such hatred. Therefore, I think it is worth the effort.
Although we were located in Los Angeles, we didn't feel such goals were beyond our reach because the Linux user groups community gave us contacts worldwide, including 85 in 19 cities in Yugoslavia, so soon we were sending out this appeal:
We represent a special interest group who’s goal is to assist in reuniting Kosovo refugees. Specifically, we are establishing an internet web server and database to facilitate refugees with locating families and loved ones. Your assistance\advice would be greatly appreciated towards accomplishing this goal. 
Our initial appeal led to some very interesting email exchanges. We thought it absolutely revolutionary that we could now communicate on a person-to-person level with ordinary people on all sides of a conflict half a world away. We were no longer prisoners of media reporting on a distant conflict. We could make our own news, and did. Now that the Internet has matured into facebook and Twitter, we expect this sort of thing, but in 1999 to be able to circulate independent reports and images of what was happening in Kosovo was mind blowing! Although, I have to admit that all Linux users didn't see things the way we did. I especially remember one fellow from Belgrade that suggested that the best way we could help out was to convince the Pentagon to use more Microsoft products.

Even then, that was a hard sell, the Pentagon was finding disfavor with Redmond's shaky products. When computer crashes can cost lives, half-baked solutions become hard to shallow.

Anyway, after an initial attempt to do our own thing, we discovered an NGO successfully doing the same thing, and folded our efforts into its. It was the first time such a thing was being tried. It was the first time, in eons of war, that such a thing was even possible! I argued in an email:
I think that one master database is the best solution for Kosovo refugees. That avoids duplication and allows for all efforts to be concentrated. It means one place to gather information, and one place to search.

It means one link on the web page for refugee information. One URL to publicize among relief workers, news media, refugee organizations, etc.

Thanks to the web, one site can full fill this worldwide need. Also, thanks to the web, all who want to can participate in this effort.

We are less interested in building another independent database than we are in supporting a unified effort led by those that are closer to the crisis.

What I think we can offer is the necessary systems infrastructure for such an effort, namely bandwidth and hardware. Thorough our ties to the Internet and corporate communities in Southern California, and especially given the current atmosphere, I feel confident we can scrounge an almost unlimited supply of both.  We can also provide people in this area with a wide range of programming and sysadmin skills to help to put together and maintain the site.

What domain name it is under, and who manages it, these are separate questions.  As you know, this can be done from anywhere in the world.  
We didn't know it at the time, but we were pioneering political uses of the Internet that wouldn't be fully realized for more than a decade with its dynamic role in the Arab Spring.

As Linux developed into an industrial strength system, the question Google is currently grappling with, participation with the war machine, became ever more pressing as the metal of this publicly owned ["copyleft"], labor donated, open source computer operating system was shown to best all others, and the Pentagon came a calling.

When the Windows NT system running the US Navy's new "Smart Ship," Aegis missile cruiser USS Yorktown crashed so badly that it had to be towed in 1998, we had great fun with it in Linux circles. We said that Microsoft had given "blue screen of death," a whole new meaning.

Soon the military was looking to Linux for the kind of stability and robustness they needed [ Imagine that: Stability and utility from a worldwide collective of volunteers versus a corporate behemoth! There is an important lesson here.] Soon, even tiny Linux companies, like my own Cosmos Engineering Company, were receiving lucrative contracts from arms makers like General Dynamics.

For some, including me, the beginning of the Iraq War in 2003 became a turning point. On 4 January 2004, I published this to the group's mailing list:
By some estimates the United States has killed more than 6.5 million people of color since the end of WWII. That is more human beings than were murdered in the Holocaust. That total includes maybe a million people killed by us during the Korean War, as many as 2 million in Vietnam, not to mention Laos and Cambodia, a million killed by sanctions in Iraq. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright thought that the death of 500,000 Iraqi children was "worth it" because Iraq had WMD, except now it appears they didn't. (Our bad).

Then there are the numerous smaller massacres like the thousand of Panamanians slaughtered and bulldozed into mass graves in the name of catching a drug dealer.

Already we have killed tens of thousands of Iraqis in the name of bringing democracy to those oppressed people. Exactly what our idea of democracy for the Iraqis is is illustrated by "A statement issued by the U.S.-led authority and broadcast by the Iraqi media network Wednesday, December 31, [that] said no individual or group is allowed to organize marches or demonstrations or even gather in streets, public places or buildings at any time without a prior from the occupation command." And the fact that all across Iraq we have been shooting unarmed demonstrators.

Up until now Linux has had very little to do with this carnage, but this is rapidly changing.

'The US Army has abandoned Windows and chosen Linux for a key component of its "Land Warrior" programme, according to a report in National Defense Magazine. According to program manager Lt Col Dave Gallop this is part of a broader move towards Linux by the US Army: "Evidence shows that Linux is more stable. We are moving in general to where the Army is going, to Linux-based OS."'

Linux has been designated the core OS of the Stryker Brigades being deployed in Iraq. The Stryker Brigades are based on a new rubber tired armored vehicle, the Stryker. These new units represent the cutting edge of a military that is rapidly retooling itself from being a defense against a creditable threat like the USSR, to becoming a instrument of repression of third world people's struggle for self-determination. The Stryker brigades are also highly computerized. Plans call for complete computerization down to each individual soldier wearing a computer, and all those computers will be running Linux. General Dynamics has the contract. Time was they hired my company, Cosmos Engineering to do Linux development for them, but they are way pass that now. Embedded Linux is also making important inroads in the military. It is starting to show up in smart bombs and cruise missiles.

Since it's deployment in Iraq, the Stryker Brigades have been among the most brutal of the occupation forces and this brutality is not unrelated to the computer game cocoon in which many of our forces operate. For example while we have been celebrating the Christmas holidays, soldiers from the Fort Lewis-based Stryker brigades cordoned off the city of Samara, conducted house to house searches and shot anyone who resisted. "The soldiers move cautiously into this clutch of concrete-block homes, rousting the men, women and wide-eyed children. Uninvited, the Americans head inside, poking through cabinets, closets and shelves, and peering beneath the beds...this is the boot of the American occupation"

"It provokes people's hatred," said Mohammed Ibrahim, imam of a Sunni mosque near Forward Operating Base Vanguard. "When your life is threatened with raids, and you are expecting that everyday, life becomes so cheap, so worthless that you would rather die than live."

How many innocent people did we kill over the holidays? We are spared from knowing because, as an Army spokeswoman said "We don't take Iraqi casualties" and we have forbidden the Iraqi authorities from counting the dead.

If the pentagon has its way, 2004 will be the first year that Linux is used for killing on a wide scale. I for one oppose this. What meager contributions I have made to Linux over that past 8 years, including founding this organization, have been done because I see it as an instrument to advance humanity. I will not see it turned into a instrument of death and destruction without a fight.
In the past my company has done work for the Army, Navy and Air Force, not to mention General Dynamics, Lockheed, Rockwell, and Boeing. I have sinned in the past, and I know how tempting fat military contracts can be, especially now when development dollars can be hard to come by. But the question facing my company, and the rest of the Linux community, now is are we developing the brains of a monster?
When another LULA member complained that anti-war posts were a violation of list etiquette,  I responded, 5 November 2003:
As our President and many other officials have made clear recently we intend to stay in Iraq no matter what. At the same time we are facing growing popular opposition to our occupation. What we are planning, and in fact carrying out, amounts to little more than mass murder because we are clearly willing to use whatever level of violence is needed to conquer the Iraqi people. Already we are selectively putting certain communities in 'lock down,' and killing or imprisoning anyone who dares oppose us. We are even shooting at journalist who try to cover it, although frankly most are so tame there is no need.

The poor Americans that have been forced to turn to the military for a job will be forced to do the killing and dying. Fortunately for us, most LULA members do not fall into that category. All that is required of us is nothing. Just carry on business as usual and let it happen.

It is my position that war is not just another subject. It is my position that when your country embarks upon a war of aggression against a much smaller, weaker country, and starts killing other people in large numbers, you lose of your right not to be bothered by it. Because we are such a powerful country, we can be in the happy position destroying another country, killing thousands of its people, and expect that it should not even be brought up in a Linux meeting. What 'white man's burden' arrogance! It has been said that all is fair in love and war. While I don't know that I would go that far, I will say that I am not terribly bothered if I infringe upon netiquette in opposing the war.

I just finish watching ABC's Nightline, which was sponsored tonight by IBM, with a Linux commercial no less. Of course they talked about the American causalities. In a more perfect world they would have also talked about the much more numerous Iraqi casualties caused by us. Then I wouldn't have to.
And in another email:
My words aren't 'inflammatory.' Cluster bombs and depleted uranium shells are. From today's L.A.Times (11/4/03) "The attack Friday night destroyed two houses in the village of Warez [Afghanistan] in the eastern province of Nuristan, killing four children, a woman and a young man..."

Let's try another tack. Transport LULA and this disagreement in time and place. Say to Nazi Germany. Would I be wrong to speak in opposition to the extermination of the Jews among Germans that found such talk 'inflammatory' and 'off topic'? Or the United States in the mid-19th century. Would I be wrong to speak out against slavery even if it was considered a divisive subject? I think not! But since at that time there would have very likely been LULA members who favored slavery and the killing of Jews, I can only assume you would have found such talk a grave violation of etiquette. Of course hindsight is easy. I seriously doubt if today any LULA member supports slavery or the killing of Jews. That is why it is so easy to take a stand on historical questions, but it is also irrelevant to do so. Today it is people in Iraq and Afghanistan that are dying, and it is we who are doing the killing. And since there are very powerful economic interests that favor this, (as there was at the time for slavery and the holocaust), the reality of these wrongs is somewhat muddied.

The Bottom Line is This:

War is simultaneously the most coercive and most destructive of all human endeavors. With the current levels technology it will lead to the complete destruction of humanity, quite possibly in our own lifetimes. It is quite obvious that war is forced upon those that are the subject of aggression. The people of Baghdad were given no say but to suffer the effects of 8,000 or so cruise missiles slammed into their town for example. But even in the aggressor nation it is generally a matter of coercion for a majority. Even with our "volunteer" army, many feel they have no real choice, and as for the financing of the enterprise, the money is appropriated from those that oppose the aggression as well as those that it support it.

It is because of this coercive nature of war that those that oppose it cannot, I repeat CANNOT, confine their activities to those who would 'opt in' to such opposition. To allow those who promote the war, and those who think they have no part in it, to go about there business in peace, is to allow the war to continue even if the majority oppose it. This simply is not an acceptable solution to the problem of humanity's success.
When I resigned as president of LULA in April 2004 to focus more of my energy on anti-war work, including producing my first feature length documentary, News Clips from the Iraq War, which was streamed on the Internet years before YouTube [which runs on Linux], by the Linux Public Broadcast Network [LPBN], I wrote:
I once had high hopes for Linux. I felt sure it could make a real contribution to the success of humanity, now more and more I have my doubts. I have a real and growing fear that if the Mr. Smith’s of Linux [a Matrix reference. Matrix was all the rage with the Slashdot crowd.] have their way, in the future they will look back and say “Wasn’t it nice that so many smart people worked to hard for free to forge their own chains."
Newsforge ran an article with the title LUG Pres Resigns Over Military Linux Use, and when Joe Barr posted a link to Slashdot with this comment:
"NewsForge is carrying the news that the founder and president of Linux Users Los Angeles (LULA) has resigned because of his opposition to the war in Iraq and the U.S. Armed Forces' use of Linux."
It ignited a discussion [i.e. flame-war] that extended to 1361 comments.

In the fourteen years since that discussion, the Pentagon has largely been able to count on the greed and cooperation of the tech industry. This new decision by Google represents an important move in the right correct direction. It makes me hope that a little of its open source ancestry lives on at Google.

My other blogs on Google:
Google correct the record: Little girl was beheaded by Assad not ISIS [GRAPHIC!] 4/30/17
Why are they protesting Google?  6/19/13
Coming Soon: Obama versus Google 5/19/11
Google Supports Revolts | Anonymous does too! 2/27/11
The Google Search for Wael Ghonim 2/9/11
Google Goes Rebel, Supports Egyptian Protest 2/6/11
The Internet Takeover: Why Google is Next 12/05/10
EFF on the Google\Verizon Net Neutrality Proposal 8/30/10
Court rules -> Google Must Be Evil & Maximize Profits 8/30/10
Google-Verizon: What is the Free Press Agenda? 8/13/10
Will Android make Google Money? 8/10/10
Google Verizon Announce Terms of Deal 8/9/10
Why I like Google: Reason #38 6/6/08

Syria is the Paris Commune of the 21st Century!

Click here for our posts on the 2016 US Election
Click here for a list of our other blogs on Syria
Click here for a list of our other blogs on Libya

Friday, June 1, 2018

Maxine Waters' white supremacist opponent exposed!

President Donald Trump didn't just fail to condemn the extreme racism we all saw on display in Charlottesville, VA last summer, he is trying to bring people like that into the US government. One of the ways he and his cabal are doing that is by promoting people whose racist views aren't that well known, and then passing them off as ordinary conservatives. He is rapidly appointing many of these to all levels of the federal government. They are trying to get others elected to office as vanilla Republicans, now that the GOP has largely been taken over by racists. Think of Congressman Steve Scalise, who sold himself as "David Duke without the baggage."

Congresswoman Maxine Waters
It is extremely important to realize they aren't just working towards a peaceful government takeover; they are also building connections to the type of groups and individuals that flocked to the "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville.

In a related matter, they really hate Congresswoman Maxine Waters with a passion. She is an African American woman that has a long history of fighting for social justice, and she has been outspoken about the need to impeach Trump from day one. Now these white supremacists have dressed up one of their associates in a suit, and they are trying to replace Maxine Waters with him. Gary Walker told a big part of the story in this week's Argonaut:


30 May 2018
It’s no secret that supporters of President Donald Trump would love to be rid of Rep. Maxine Waters (D- Los Angeles), one of the president’s most gleeful antagonists. Perhaps underscoring their aversion for the 14-term incumbent, Trump confidant and political strategist Roger Stone is lending support to one of Waters’ three Republican challengers in Tuesday’s primary election.

Famous (or infamous, depending whom you ask) for his use of opposition research and aggressive campaign tactics, Stone wasted no time flinging mud at Waters while endorsing Torrance small business owner Omar Navarro during a campaign rally in the South Bay last year.

“Omar is the kind of hard-charging young reformer that we need in Congress. He’s an honest man, whereas Maxine Waters may be the single most corrupt members of Congress,” Stone says in a YouTube video published last August. “She’s living high. She’s eating filet mignon while the people in Omar’s district are eating hamburger.” More...
His Tweeter account @RealOmarNavarro is described as "Candidate for Congress running against @MaxineWaters. Endorsed by @RealSheriffJoe @LarryElder @TheHermanCain @GenFlynn @PastorDScott Advisor Roger Stone"

Roger Stone and Omar Navarro at a South Bay campaign rally last year
Roger Stone told the Argonaut, 18 May 2018, “The people of the 43rd [Congressional] District deserve better than poverty pimp Maxine Waters. While her district starves and lives in circumstances reminiscent of a Third World country… she sits pretty in a McMansion.”

Steve Bannon with Omar Navarro
Roger Stone's connections to Donald Trump are so well known that its pretty clear that if Stone is actively working for Navarro, Trump supports his bid too. What's more, former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn visited California on the birthday of Ho Chi Minh and Malcolm X {19 May} to endorse Navarro, so it would already appear they are planning to mount a noisy base-building challenge to Maxine Waters. He has no chance of winning.

Gary Walker gave you a part of the picture. The picture below gives you a view of Omar Navarro the Trump cabal would like to hide.

In the video below, when Gionet first sees Omar, he says "Hey, What's up Omar? Hey, what's up? Omar's a little ... I'm not going to blow his cover.  He's a little incognito." 

Allow me to blow his cover.
Omar Navarro joins Anthime Gionet [aka Baked Alaska] and other white nationalists to disrupt a meeting of the Santa Monica Committee for Racial Justice on 6 August 2017.
This picture is from the white nationalist assault on the Santa Monica Committee for Racial Justice last Summer. You can read more about that here: Six days before Charlottesville, the same racists came to Santa Monica

While Omar Navarro was camera shy and stayed in the background, Gionet and others tried to break up the meeting, 6 August 2017.
This picture is from the Baked Alaska livestream of the racists at Charlottesville on the march:

A week later Gionet was speaking to the klansmen and Nazis in Charlottesville, 11 August 2017
The two clips in this YouTube video show Omar Navarro and Gionet chatting at their anti-racial justice action, and then Gionet in the Tiki-touch parade in Charlottesville

The first minute is of Navarro with Gionet, a local So. Cal Alt-Right/White nationalist leader when they tried to crash the meeting of the Santa Monica Committee for Racial Justice on August 6, 2017. The second minute is an establishing shot of Baked Alaska - 5 days later he is leading the Charlottesville "Unite the Right" touch light march, where he spoke the next day.

Syria is the Paris Commune of the 21st Century!

Click here for our posts on the 2016 US Election
Click here for a list of our other blogs on Syria
Click here for a list of our other blogs on Libya